¹ Laddas, Stephen P., The Exchange of Minorities. Bulgaria, Greece and Turkey (New York, 1932).Google Scholar

² Schechtman, Joseph B., European Population Transfers 1939–1945 (New York, 1946).Google Scholar

³ Department of State. Occupation of Germany, Policy and Progress (Washington, D. C, 1947, p. 151).Google Scholar

⁴ Expellees and Refugees of German Ethnic Origin. Report of a Special Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 81st Congress, 2. Session. Report No. 1841 (Washington, D. C. March 24, 1950), pp. 5–8.

⁵ Byrnes, James F., Speaking Frankly (New York and London, 1947), p. 80.Google Scholar

⁶ Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, Les transferts internationaux de populations (Paris 1946), p. 19.Google Scholar

⁷ Czechoslovak Home Service, 07 10, 09 6, 1945.Google Scholar

⁸ Deportation Drama in Czechoslovakia, Special edition of Der Sozioldemokrat (London, 1945)Google Scholar. Also: Tragedy of a People. Racialism in Czechoslovakia, published by the American Friends of Democratic Sudetens (New York, 1946).Google Scholar

⁹ Occupation of Germany. Policy and Progress, p. 76.Google Scholar

¹⁰ According to the material put at the disposal of this writer by Czechoslovak governmental bodies during his visit to Czechoslovakia in January, 1947.

¹¹ Office of Military Government for Germany (U. S.) Statistical Annex, Report of the Military Governor 1–31 05 1947, N 23, p. 2.Google Scholar

¹² Betts, R. R., ed. Central and South Europe (London, 1950), p. 177.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid.

¹⁴ New York Times, 07 26, 1946.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., Feb. 11, 1947.

¹⁶ Bayerisches Staatsministerium des Innern. Staatssekretär für das Flüchtlingswesen. 4 Jahre Vertriebenenbetreuung in Bayern (Munich 1950), p. 33Google Scholar

¹⁷ New York Times, 02 8, 1950.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Ibid., Feb. 25 and 27, March 6 and 18, 1947.

¹⁹ George, Pierre, “The New Settlement Policy in Czechoslovakia”, Slavonic and East European Review (11 1947), p. 66Google Scholar. Also: Dokoncime Velke Osidlovaci Dilo (Prague 1946), p. 17.Google Scholar

²⁰ Data put at the disposal of this writer by Dr. Miroslav Kreysa, Chairman of the Czechoslovak Resettlement Office.

²¹ Occupation of Germany, etc., pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

²² Ibid.

²³ Department of State, Communiqué N 16, 12 7, 1945.Google Scholar

²⁴ The Economist (London 02 15), 1947.Google Scholar

²⁵ Gluck, Leopold, “The Economic Reconstruction of the Recovered Territories,” Western Review (07-08 1947), p. 117.Google Scholar

²⁸ Data supplied by the Polish Foreign Office.

²⁷ DrReichling, G. and DrBetz, F. H., Die Heimatvertriebenen—Glied oder Aussenseiter der deutschen Gemeinschaft? (Frankfurt am Main 1949). pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

²⁸ New York Times, 03 4, 1950.Google Scholar

²⁹ Polish Facts and Figures (London, 10 30, 1948).Google Scholar

³⁰ Report of Deputy Prime Minister Jedrechowsky to the Recovered Territories Congress in Wroclaw on Sept. 21, 1952. Press Release of the Polish Embassy in Washington, D. C.

³¹ La Hongrie et la Conference de Paris. Les Rapports Internationaux de la Hongrie avant la Conference de Paris. Publié par le Ministère des Affaires Etrangères de Hongrie. (Budapest 1947), pp. 37–39.

³² Military Government of Germany, Displaced Persons, Stateless Persons and RefugeesGoogle Scholar. Monthly Report of the Military Governor, U. S. Zone, 05 8, 1945–09 30, 1945, N. 15, p. 8, and 02 20, 1946, N. 7, p. 25.Google Scholar

³³ Ibid., 1–30 Sept. 1946, N. 15 p. 20. Office of the Military Government of Germany, Report of the Military Governor. 05 1–31, 1947Google Scholar. N. 23, Statistical Annex p. 2.

³⁴ Schechtman, Joseph B., “Elimination of German Minorities in Southeastern Europe,” Journal of Central European Affairs (07 1946), pp. 154–160.Google Scholar

³⁶ Schechtman, , op. cit., pp. 150–162.Google Scholar

³⁶ New York Times, 10 19 and 20, 1946.Google Scholar

³⁷ Ibid., May 15, 1947. Kulischer, Eugen M., Europe on the Move. War and Population Changes 1917–1949 (New York 1948), p. 286.Google Scholar

³⁸ Coad, Thomas Jervell, The Elimination of Ethnic Germans from Parts of Central, Eastern and Southern Europe from 1939 to 1951Google Scholar. A Thesis Presented to the Division of History and Social Science, Reed College, May 1951 (unpublished).

³⁹ Wirtschaft und Statistik, 10 1949, p. 558.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Soviet News (London), 03 13, 1947.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid.

⁴² The Integration of Refugees into German Life. A Report of the ECA Technical Assistance Commission of the Integration of the Refugees in the German Republic. Submitted to the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. March 21, 1951, p. 7 (herein referred to as the “Sonne Report”).

⁴³ Counterpart funds are local currency paid by Germany for dollarfinanced European Recovery Program imports. In 1949–1951, counterpart releases totalling $760 million were authorized by the Economic Cooperation Administration for an investment program prepared by the Bonn government. See New York Times, 05 29, 1949, 06 25, 1950, 12 25, 1951Google Scholar; Office of the U. S. High Commissioner for Germany, 1st Quarterly Report on Germany, 09 21-12 31, 1949, p. 24.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See: Expellees and Refugees of German Ethnic Origin, supra, p. 27.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Sonne Report, p. 19Google Scholar. Limited possibilities for easing the expellees situation are offered by the 1950 U. S. Displaced Persons Act. As amended by both Houses of Congress, it provides for the admission of 54, 744 Volksdeutsche expellees (as compared with 23, 377 authorized by the Displaced Persons Act of 1948) in Germany and Austria.

⁴⁶ Sonne Report, p. 6Google Scholar. See also: Jaenicke, Wolfgang (Commissioner for Refuge Affairs in Bavaria), Arbeit Schafft Heimat (Munich 1950).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Sonne Report, p. 10, 3.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Ibid., pp. 10, 63–64, 66. Economic integration is also removing cultural and psychological barriers between the newcomers and the indigenous German population: a gradual process of assimilation is undoubtedly taking place. DrLemberg, Eugen and Kreckel, Lothar devote a challenging study to the “Rise of a New Station from Indigenous Germans and Eastern Expellees” (Die Entstehung eines neuen Volkes aus Binnendeutschen und Ostvertriebenen [Marburg, 1950])Google Scholar. See also: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Cultural Assimilation of Immigrants (London-New York, 1950).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Crimea Conference Report (The Woodrow Wilson Foundation, New York 1945).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ New York Times, 09 15, 1944Google Scholar; Washington Post, 09 15, 1944Google Scholar; Radio Polskie (Lublin), 09 23, 1944Google Scholar; Pravda, 09 25, 1944Google Scholar; Polish Provisional Government broadcasts from Moscow, April 8, 1945.

⁵¹ Kurier Codzienny 12 12, 1945.Google Scholar

⁵² Soviet-Polish Relations. A Collection of Official Documents (London 1946), pp. 32–33Google Scholar. Polpress News, 07 18, 1945.Google Scholar

⁵³ Statistical News Nos. 6/7, 1947.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Czas, 05 25, 1947.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Statistical News, 02 1946, No. 2, p. 18Google Scholar; Aug. 20, 1947 p 242; Statistical Book of Poland, 1947, p. 29.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Poland. Recovered Territories (Poznan 1947), p. 8.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Olechnowicz, M., “The Settlement of the Recovered Territory,” Western Review, 07-08 1947, p. 110.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ New York Times, 06 30, 1945.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Memorandum on Transfer and Re-Emigration put at the disposal of the writer by Ing. Odon Para, Chief of the Vth Section of the Czechoslovak Foreign Ministry.

⁶⁰ Radio Prague, 05 13, 1947.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Annuaire Statistique de la Ripublique Tchécho-Slovaque (Prague 1936), p. 7.Google Scholar

⁶² The Development of the Negotiations Between Czechoslovakia and Hungary Concerning the Movement of Population (Czechoslovak Memorandum presented to Paris Peace Conference) (Paris 1947)Google Scholar. Also: Hungary and the Conference of Paris, vol. II: Hungary's International Relations Before the Conference of Paris. Published by the Hungarian Ministry for Foreign Affairs (Budapest, 1947).Google Scholar

⁶³ Zpravy Ceskoslovenske Tiskove Kancelaze, New York, 10 7, 1947.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Schechtman, , European Population Transfers, pp. 488–496.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Schechtman, Joseph B., “Compulsory Transfer of the Turkish Minority from Bulgaria” Journal of Central European Affairs (07 1952)Google Scholar and India Quarterly (10-12 1952).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Central European Observer (London), 11 11, 1950.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ New York Times, 08 13 and 10 12, 1950.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ News from Turkey, 10 12, 1950.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Ibid., Dec. 12, 1950.

⁷⁰ The Christian Science Monitor, 01 7, 1952Google Scholar. In February 1953, Turkey re-opened her border for Turkish repatriates from Bulgaria. New York Times, 02 22, 1953.Google Scholar