Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T19:31:16.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using consensus methods to establish multidisciplinary perspectives on research priorities for primary care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Catherine Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, RFUCL Medical School, UK
Stephen Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, RFUCL Medical School, UK
Caroline McGraw
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, RFUCL Medical School, UK
Greg Battle
Affiliation:
North Islington Primary Care Group, UK
Lee Furniss
Affiliation:
North Islington Primary Care Group, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The execution and incorporation of research into practice is influenced by the relevance and credibility of the work undertaken. Part of this process can be to identify priority research questions from the service provider perspective. We sought to obtain a multidisciplinary consensus on priority research questions around the broad issue of prescribing in an inner London Primary Care Group locality. Participants were drawn from general practice, primary care nursing and community pharmacy. This paper explores how two formal consensus methods were used to facilitate multidisciplinary participation within the research arena, and the extent to which a convergence of opinion between professional groups was obtained. The use of a structured nominal group interview technique abated professional dominance and generated a diverse array of research questions. An iterative Delphi process secured a wide consensus of opinion regarding the relevance of these questions to practice. The richness of the research questions generated was attributed to the consultation process and the ability of the consensus methods used to capture the multidisciplinary perspective. The practice based research questions identified were diverse and suited to a collaborative research approach.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2004 Arnold