Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:52:36.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineral and protein equilibria between the colloidal and soluble phases of milk at low temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Alice Pierre
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitieère, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, CNRZ, 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
Gerard Brule
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitieère, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, CNRZ, 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France

Summary

Mechanisms controlling exchange and partition of minerals and β-casein between micellar and soluble phases during cooling have been studied using suspensions of milk proteins of varying concentrations in the presence of aqueous phases having varying mineral compositions. In these studies the final equilibrium between Ca and phosphate was found to be regulated by formation of Ca phosphates of varying solubilities. The effect of the total casein level on mineral and protein equilibria was also studied. In milk, part of the β-casein content is bound to micelles by hydrophobic bonds; the proportion present in this form was increased by spontaneous micellar demineralization during cooling as well as by addition of a complexant to milk. At low temperatures, an equilibrium between the micellar and the monomeric states was reached which depends upon the total casein level and on the hydrophobic-bonded β-casein content. Not all of these hydrophobic bonds were broken when milk was cooled.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. L., Atkinson, D., Evans, M. T. A., Finer, E. G., Green, J. P., Phillips, M. C. & Robertson, R. N. (1979). Biopolymers 18, 11051121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulé, G. & Fauquant, J. (1981). Journal of Dairy Research 48, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulé, G., Maubois, J. L. & Fauquant, J. (1974). Lait 54, 600615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulé, G., Real del Sol, E., Fauquant, J. & Fiaud, C. (1978). Journal of Dairy Science 61, 12251232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creamer, L. K. (1970). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 5, 152154.Google Scholar
Creamer, L. K., Berry, G. P. & Mills, O. E. (1977). New Zealand Jounal of Dairy Science and Technology 12, 5866.Google Scholar
Davies, D. T. & White, J. C. D. (1960). Journal of Dairy Research 27, 171190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. J. (1964). Annales of New York Academy of Sciences 121, 404427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, W. K. & Murphy, R. F. (1970). Journal of Dairy Research 37, 361372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation (1971). Standard 33 A.Google Scholar
Jenness, R. & Patton, S. (1959). Principles of Dairy Chemistry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lin, S. H. C., Leong, S. L., Dewan, R. K., Bloomfield, V. A. & Morr, C. V. (1972). Biochemistry 11, 18181821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niki, R., Kimura, T. & Arima, S. (1980). Milchwissenschaft 35, 202205.Google Scholar
Niki, R., Takase, K. & Arima, S. (1977). Milchwissenschaft 32, 577582.Google Scholar
Pearce, K. N. (1975). European Journal of Biochemistry 58, 2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 18971902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. & Tessier, H. (1959). Journal of Dairy Science 42, 969980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slattery, C. W. (1979). Journal of Dairy Research 46, 253258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar