Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:57:33.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed taints in dairy produce. II. Coronopus or land cress taint in milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. J. Park
Affiliation:
Otto Madsden Dairy Research Laboratory, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia
J. D. Armitt
Affiliation:
Otto Madsden Dairy Research Laboratory, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Australia
W. Stark
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Research, C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne, Australia

Summary

Unheated Coronopus-tainted milk yielded butterfat from which benzyl methyl sulphide, benzyl isothiocyanate, benzyl cyanide, indole and skatole were isolated by high-vacuum distillation. The first 3 of these compounds were also isolated from the corresponding skim-milk, buttermilk and butter serum by vacuum steam distillation: identification was by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry.

The flavour threshold of benzyl methyl sulphide in milk and butter oil was found to be respectively, 1 part in 108 and 1 part in 107, whereas the amount isolated from butterfat was approximately 1 part in 106.

This evidence, together with the similarity in flavour of the Coronopus taint in milk and butter oil with that of untainted milk and butter oil to which had been added respectively, 1 part in 107 and 1 part in 106 of benzyl methyl sulphide, demonstrates that benzyl methyl sulphide is a principal contributor to the flavour defect. A hypothesis is proposed to explain the origin of the sulphide and related components in the milk. The possibility remains that in commercial weed-tainted butter, which is made from heated cream, other compounds may be present.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitt, J. (1968). Qd agric. J. 94, 2.Google Scholar
Bacon, R. G. R. (1961). Organic Sulfur Compounds, p. 306 (Ed. Kharasch, N..) London: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, J. H., Lawesson, S. O., Madson, J., Schroll, G. & Williams, D. H. (1966). J. chem. Soc. B, p. 951.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. & Greenberg, D. M. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta 46, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conochie, J. (1950). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 5, 43.Google Scholar
Conochie, J. (1953). Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 31, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. & Webb, E. C. (1964). Enzymes, 2nd edn. p. 700. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Forss, D. A. (1951). Aust. J. appl. Sci. 2, 396.Google Scholar
Forss, D. A., Stark, W. & Urbach, G. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leverington, R. E. & Morgan, R. C. (1964). Qd J. agric. Sci. 21, 33.Google Scholar
Leverington, R. E. & Morgan, R. C. (1967). Qd J. agric. Anim. Sci. 24, 41.Google Scholar
Lindsay, R. C.Day, E. A. & Sandine, W. E. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, W. C. T. (1966). 17th Int. Dairy Congr. Munich C, p. 33.Google Scholar
McDowall, F. H., Morton, I. D. & Mcdowell, A. K. R. (1947). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. A28, 305.Google Scholar
McDowall, F. H., Mcdowell, A. K. R., Morton, I. D., Singleton, J. A. & O'dea, J. J. (1951). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. A 33, 35.Google Scholar
Oaks, D. M., Hartmann, H. & Dimick, K. P. (1964). Analyt. Chem. 36, 1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, R. J. (1965). Nature, Lond. 207, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, R. J. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, S. & Josephson, D. V. (1957). Fd Res. 22, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, W., Smith, J. F. & Forss, D. A. (1967). J. Dairy Res. 34, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbach, G. (19641965). Rep. Div. Dairy Res. C.S.I.R.O. Australia.Google Scholar
Urbach, G. (1966). Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 21, 46.Google Scholar