Think
- Think / Volume 8 / Issue 22 / Summer 2009, pp 101-105
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2009
- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1477175609000128 (About DOI), Published online: 23 March 2009
Research Article
CONTEXTUALIST VS. ANALYTIC HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY: A STUDY IN SOCRATES
Constantine Sandis
I here respond to James Warren and John Shand's replies to my paper ‘In Defence of Four Socratic Doctrines’ (all published in THINK 17) by questioning the supremacy of contextualist history of philosophy over the so-called ‘analytic’ approach.
Constantine Sandis is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at Oxford Brookes University and New York University in London.
