Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:08:14.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MORAL DILEMMAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

Get access

Extract

Could it be that one morally ought to do something morally bad? Some people think the answer is obviously ‘No’. Indeed, these theorists may say, it is contradictory to suppose that one morally ought to do something morally bad. Others hold that it is not a contradiction but a sad fact of life that one may be morally required to do something morally bad. This latter position is the one I'll be supporting. If it's the right view, it really matters in practical affairs. For example, almost everyone would agree that it's morally bad to kill an innocent fetus. But this does not settle the question of whether one morally ought to have an abortion, if it can be morally required that one do something morally bad.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1 This is equivalent to ‘if O(A) then ¬ O(¬A)’ which might be glossed ‘the same action cannot be obligatory and forbidden’ (McConnell, Terrence (2006) “Moral Dilemmas”. In E. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).