Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T18:31:23.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—The Pendleton Earth-shake of November 25th, 1905

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Pendleton lies on the north-west side of Manchester and within the borough of Salford, and is traversed by the well-known Pendleton or Irwell Valley fault, a fault which has been traced for more than twenty miles from the neighbourhood of Bolton to that of Poynton in Cheshire. The fault is still slowly growing, for, on February 10th, 1889, a slip near Bolton gave rise to an earthquake of intensity 6, felt over an area of about 2,500 square miles. Small superficial movements may also be taking place close to Pendleton, though here probably aided by mining operations. Within the last seven years there have been local shakes on three occasions, namely, February 27th, 1899, April 7th, 1900, and November 25th, 1905. The materials for the study of the first two of these shakes are not quite sufficient to determine the boundaries of their disturbed areas with accuracy. The areas appear, however, to have been approximately circular in form and about four or five miles in diameter. In both cases the intensity of the shock was 4, or nearly 5. In 1899 the centre of the disturbed area was about half a mile north of Pendleton and a short distance on the north-east or downthrow side of the Pendleton fault; in 1900 it lay a mile or two farther to the south or south-south-east of the former centre.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 171 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. III, Vol. VIII (1891), pp. 306316.Google Scholar

page 172 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. VII (1900), p. 175; Deo. IV, Vol. VIII (1901), p. 361.Google Scholar

page 174 note 1 M. Baratta, “Intorno ai recenti fenomeni endogeni avvenuti nella regione Etnea”: Boll. della Soc. Geogr. Ital., Oct. 1894.

page 175 note 1 This would be the case if the vertical dimension of the focus was small.

page 176 note 1 For a similar suggestion see Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. II (1905), p. 223.Google Scholar