Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-6f5p8 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-04-14T20:04:43.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ability of trainee general practitioners to identify psychological distress among their patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

D. P. Goldberg ,
L. Jenkins ,
T. Millar  and
E. B. Faragher
D. P. Goldberg*
Affiliation:
Mental Illness Research Unit, University of Manchester
L. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Mental Illness Research Unit, University of Manchester
T. Millar
Affiliation:
Mental Illness Research Unit, University of Manchester
E. B. Faragher
Affiliation:
Mental Illness Research Unit, University of Manchester
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor D. P. Goldberg, University of Manchester, School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Withington Hospital, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

It is argued that a general practitioner's ability to make accurate ratings of psychological distress is partly determined by the rate at which patients emit cues that are indicative of such distress. This study addresses the behaviours of doctors which influence the rates at which patients emit such cues. Consultations were videotaped involving six General Practice Vocational Trainees, three of them poor, and three of them able identifiers of emotional illness. Consultations were selected so that each trainee was rated interviewing 4 patients with low GHQ scores, and 4 patients with high scores. Behaviours are described which lead to increased cue emission and which are also practised more frequently by able identifiers, while other behaviours reduce cue emission and are practised less frequently by them. Another set of behaviours is no more frequent among the able identifiers, but when practised by able identifiers is associated with increased cue emission by the patients, and when practised by poor identifiers with unaltered or decreased cue emission. Interviews that are ‘patient-led’ are associated with increased rates of cue emission, while those that are ‘doctor-led’ are associated with lower rates. The implications of these findings for training doctors working in general medical settings are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1993 , pp. 185 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B. & Hinde, J. (1989). Statistical Modelling in GLIM (5). Oxford Science Publications: London.Google Scholar
Baker, R. (1985). GLIM 3.77 Reference Manual. Numerical Algorithms Group: Oxford.Google Scholar
Breslow, N. E. (1984). Extra-Poisson variation in log-linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 33, 38–44.Google Scholar
Byrne, P. S. & Long, B. E. (1976). Doctors Talking to Patients. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Davenport, S., Goldberg, D. & Millar, T. (1987). How psychiatric disorders are missed during medical consultations. Lancet ii, 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gask, L., McGrath, G., Goldberg, D. & Millar, T. (1987). Improving the psychiatric skills of established general practitioners: evaluation of group teaching. Medical Education 21, 362–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gask, L., Goldberg, D., Lesser, A. & Millar, T. (1988). Improving the psychiatric skills of the general practice trainee: an evaluation of a group training course. Medical Education 22, 132–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. & Bridges, K. (1987). Screening for psychiatric illness in general practice: the general practitioner versus the screening questionnaire. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 37, 15–18.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Huxley, P. J. (1980). Mental Illness in the Community – the Pathway to Psychiatric Care. Tavistock Publications: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Huxley, P. J. (1992). Common Mental Disorders – A Biosocial Model. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. (1988). A Users Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson: Windsor.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Steele, J., Johnson, A. & Smith, C. (1982). Ability of primary care physicians to make accurate ratings of psychological disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Gask, L. & O'Dowd, T. (1989). The treatment of somatisation: teaching techniques of re-attribution. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 33, 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennrikus, D. (1986). An observational study of the detection of psychological disturbance by general practitioners. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Smeeton, N. & Shepherd, M. (1988). Classification of Mental Disorder in Primary Care. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement No. 12. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Levenstein, J. H.. McCracken, E., McWhinney, I. R., Stewart, M. A. & Brown, J. B. (1986). The patient-centred clinical method. Family Practice 3, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, J., Goldberg, D. & Hillier, V. (1979). Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness. Psychological Medicine 9, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, T. & Goldberg, D. P. (1991). Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to manage common mental disorders. British Journal of General Practice 41, 357–359.Google Scholar
Pendleton, D. (1983). Doctor-patient communication: a review. In Doctor Patient Communication (ed. Pendleton, D. and Hasler, J.), pp. 5–56. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Raynes, N. V. (1979). Factors affecting the prescribing of psychotropic drugs in general practice consultations. Psychological Medicine 9, 671–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuckett, D., Boulton, M., Olson, C. & Williams, A. (1985). Meeting Between Experts: an Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations.Tavistock:London.Google Scholar
Tylee, P. & Freeling, P. (1989). The recognition, diagnosis and acknowledgement of depressive disorders by general practitioners. In Depression: an Integrative Approach (ed. Paykel, E. and Herbst, K.), pp. 216–231. Heinemann: London.Google Scholar