Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:35:20.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reintroduction of the Andean condor into Colombia, South America: 1989–1991

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Alan Lieberman ,
Jose Vicente Rodriguez ,
Juan Manuel Paez  and
Jim Wiley
Alan Lieberman
Affiliation:
Curator/Herpetology, San Diego Zoo, PO Box 551 San Diego, California 92112, USA.
Jose Vicente Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Conservation International, AA 85530, Santafe de Bogota, Colombia.
Juan Manuel Paez
Affiliation:
Coordinador General Programa Condor Andino, AA 85530, Santafe de Bogota, Colombia
Jim Wiley
Affiliation:
Grambling Cooperative Wildlife Program, Grambling State University, PO Box 4290, Grambling, Louisiana 71245, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From 1989 to 1991,22 captive-reared Andean condors Vultur gryphus were released into three protected areas in the Andes of Colombia, South America. The goals of this reintroduction programme were to re-establish populations of these birds in protected habitat where the species had been extirpated, and to train local biologists in the conservation techniques necessary to recover their native condor. All birds were hatched, reared and released according to the protocols established by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game for the California condor Gymnogyps californianus. At the time of release, the birds ranged in age from 11 to 26 months. Each bird was fitted with individually numbered wing tags and wing-mounted radio transmitters. Of the 22 released animals, 19 currently survive – a substantial increase to the wild population in Colombia, which had been estimated by Colombian biologists to number only 20 individuals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 83 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1993

References

Barrera, M. 1990. Proyecto para la recuperacion y proteccion del condor Andino en Colombia. Proyecto Condor Andino-Purace. Informe Anual de Actividades–1990. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Calchi, R. and Viloria, A.L. 1991. Occurrence of the Andean condor in the Perija Mountains of Venezuela. Wilson Bull. 103 (4), 720–722.Google Scholar
Cleef, A.M. 1981. The Vegetation of the Paramos of the Colombian Cordillera Oriental. PhD thesis. Tijksuniversiteit te Utrecht.Google Scholar
Hilty, S.L. and Brown, W.L. 1986. A Field Guide to the Birds of Colombia. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Inderena. 1984. Colombia - Parques Nacionales. Bogota.Google Scholar
Inderena. 1990. Convenio celebrado entre el INDERENA y el Zoologico de San Diego. Documento Numero 49/90, Bogota.Google Scholar
Kaseilke, S. and Wallace, M. 1990. Andean Condor Studbook. Los Angeles Zoo, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Kuehler, C. and Whitman, P. 1988. Artificial incubation of California condor, Gymnogyps californianus, eggs removed from the wild. Zoo Biology, 7, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGahan, J. 1971. The condor, soaring spirit of the Andes. National Geographic, 139 (5), 684–709.Google Scholar
McGahan, J. 1972. The Behavior and Ecology of the Andean Condor. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Murphy, R.C. 1936. Oceanic Birds of South America. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Nowak, R.M. and Paradiso, J.L. 1983. Walker's Mammals of the World. 4th Edition.John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Paez, J.M. 1989. Proyecto condor Andino - Zona 1. Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza. Informe Anual. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Paez, J.M. 1990a. Proyecto condor Andino - Chingaza. Informe Anual. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Paez, J.M. 1990b. Proyecto condor Andino. Informe Nacional. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Paez, J.M. 1990c. Proyecto Condor Andino - Chingaza. Evaluacion del Equipo de Telemetria. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Sanchez Paez, H., Hernandez Camacho, J.I., Rodriquez Mahecha, J.V. and Castano Uribe, C. 1990. Nuevos Parques Nacionales de Colombia. INDERENA, Bogota.Google Scholar
Toone, W. and Risser, A. 1987. Captive management of the California condor. Int. Zoo Yearbook, 27, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1970. 35 FR: 18320. December 2 1970. US Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game. 1988. Joint Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Report. Experimental Release of Andean Condors in Ventura County, California.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. and Temple, S. 1978. Competitive interactions within and between species in a guild of avian scavengers. Auk, 104, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, M., Parker, P. and Temple, S. 1980. An evaluation of patagial markers for Cathartid vultures. J. Field Orn. 51, 309–314.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. and Temple, S. 1987. Releasing captivereared Andean condors to the wild. J. Wildl. Manage. 51, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, J.W., Austen, G., Clendenen, D., Giese, A., Ledig, D., Leete, A., Lindsey, G., Mesta, R., Pedersen, H., Wallace, M., Kasielke, S., Conzales, B., Toone, W., Shima, A. and Lieberman, A. 1991. Protocols for Releases of California Condors. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura, California.Google Scholar