Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T19:28:17.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reasons for Red Data Books

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

N. J. Collar
N. J. Collar
Affiliation:
BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The late Sir Peter Scott, a former President of Fauna and Flora International, proposed the idea of Red Data Books as conservation tools more than 30 years ago. Today, the international Red Data Book programme appears to be effectively at an end, with priority being given to Action Plans and Conservation Assessment Management Plans for groups oftaxa. These, however, cannot entirely replace Red Data Books, and the author of this paper argues that Red Data Books have many vital roles to play in species conservation and makes a plea for their renascence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1996

References

Bean, M.J. 1987. Legal experience and implications. In The Road to Extinction: Problems of Categorizing the Status of Taxa Threatened with Extinction (eds Fitter, R. and Fitter, M.), pp. 39–43. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Bernardes, A.T., Machado, A.B.M. and Rylands, A.B. 1990. Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. Fundação Biodiversitas para a Conservação da Diversidade Biológica, Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Collar, N.J. 1994. Red Data Books, Action Plans, and the need for site-specific synthesis. Species, 21/22, 132–133.Google Scholar
Fitter, R. and Fitter, M. (eds). 1987. The Road to Extinction: Problems of Categorizing the Status of Taxa Threatened with Extinction. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
IUCN Species Survival Commission. 1994. IUCN Red List Categories, as Approved by the 40th Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland, Switzerland. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Long, A.J. 1995. The importance of tropical montane cloud forests for endemic and threatened birds. In Tropical Montane Cloud Forests (eds Juvik, J. O. and Scatena, F. N.), pp. 79–105. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E. 1976. We must decide which species will go forever. Smithsonian, 7 (4), 52–59.Google Scholar
Mace, G.M. 1994. Classifying threatened species: means and ends. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, B 344, 91–97.Google Scholar
McCoy, E.D. 1995. The costs of ignorance. Conserv. Biol. 9, 473–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. 1979. The Sinking Ark. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scott, P., Burton, J.A. and Fitter, R. 1987. Red Data Books: the historical background. In The Road to Extinction: Problems of Categorizing the Status of Taxa Threatened with Extinction (eds Fitter, R. and Fitter, M.), pp. 1–5. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Wege, D.C. and Long, A.J. 1995. Key Areas for Threatened Birds in the Neotropics. BirdLife Conservation Series 5, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar