Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:38:06.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertilizer and soil P uptake by paddy rice, as affected by soil P level, source and date of application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. L. Terman
Affiliation:
National Fertilizer Development Centre, Tennessee Valley Authority Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.
S. E. Allen
Affiliation:
National Fertilizer Development Centre, Tennessee Valley Authority Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.

Summary

A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted with paddy rice (Oryza sativa L. var. ‘Nato’) grown on Mountview silt loam at its initial low P level and on this soil receiving preplant unlabelled P applications (medium and high soil P levels). Labelled granular CSP (concentrated superphosphate) alone, a 2/1 mixture of CSP and DCP (dicalcium phosphate) and a 1/2 CSP-DCP mixture were evaluated.

Dry-matter yields and tillering increased markedly with amount of applied P on the low P soil, and slightly on the medium P soil; there was no response on the high P soil. Response decreased with decrease in water solubility of the applied P at the low and medium soil P levels. Total uptake of P by rice showed similar trends, except that uptake increased significantly with amount of P applied at the medium soil P level.

Percentages of plant P from the labelled fertilizer and uptake of fertilizer P increased in all situations with amount of applied P, decreased with decrease in water solubility of the applied P, and decreased with increase in soil P level. Uptake of soil P increased markedly with increase in soil P level. Soil labelling was much less satisfactory than fertilizer labelling for evaluating the effectiveness of P in different fertilizers.

A solution of labelled CSP was applied in a second experiment at time of transplanting and 3 or 6 weeks later. On the low P soil, yields, P uptake and tillering increased with rate of applied P but decreased with later date of application. On the medium P soil, yields, tillering and uptake of P by the grain were rather similar among treatments. Uptake of P in the foliage and mature straw, however, increased with later date of application. These results indicate that late-applied P is readily absorbed by rice but is not effective for increasing yields.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fried, M. (1954). Quantitative evaluation of processed and natural phosphates. J. agric. Fd Chem. 2, 241–4.Google Scholar
Fried, M. & Dean, L. A. (1952). A concept concerning the measurement of available soil nutrients. Soil Sci. 73, 263–71.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K. & Baker, D. E. (1967). An evaluation of asphalt coatings on phosphorous fertilizers. Agron. J. 59, 503–5.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. & Widdowson, F. V. (1956). The use of 32P-labelled fertilizers to measure ‘superphosphate equivalents’ of fertilizers in field and pot experiments. 6th Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Paris, 1956, B, pp. 461–70.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L. & Allen, S. E. (1969). Fertilizer and soil P uptake by maize, as affected by soil P level, granule size and. solubility of phosphate sources. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 417–24.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L., Allen, S. E. & Engelstad, O. P. (1970). Response by paddy rice to rates and sources of applied phosphorus. Agron. J. 62, 390–94.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L. & Khasawneh, F. E. (1968). Crop uptake of fertilizer and soil phosphorus in relation to calculated A values. Soil Sci. 105, 346–54.Google Scholar
Wieczorek, G. A. & Breen, A. V. (1964). Radioactive phosphate fertilizer production at Beltsville, Maryland, 1947–62. Res. Rep. no. 371, U.S. Fertil. Lab. U.S.D.A., Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar