Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:43:43.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. Sarig ,
A. Blum  and
Y. Okon
S. Sarig
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew Universityof Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100 Israel
A. Blum
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel
Y. Okon
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew Universityof Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100 Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on growth, water status and yield of dryland sorghum (cv. RS 610 and cv. H-226) growing on stored soil moisture was examined in three field experiments conducted during the years 1983–5.

Plants were sampled at regular intervals, and the following characteristics were measured: dry-matter accumulation, leaf area, grain yield, percentage nitrogen and phosphorus in leaves, leaf water potential, canopy temperature, transpiration, stomatal conductance and soil water depletion.

Inoculation led to an average increase of 19% in total stover dry-matter yield, as a result of higher rates of dry-matter accumulation during the early stages of growth. Azospirillum inoculation caused a 15–18% increase in grain yield in all three experiments. This increase was associated with a greater number of seeds per panicle.

The water regime of sorghum plants was improved by inoculation, as seen in their higher leaf water potential, lower canopy temperatures and greater stomatal conductance and transpiration. Total extraction of soil moisture by inoculated plants was greater (by about 15%) and occurred from deeper soil layers, compared with non-inoculated controls.

These findings indicate that inoculation with Azospirillum can lead to yield increases in dryland grain sorghum, primarily through improved utilization of soil moisture.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 271 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnon, I. (1972). Crop Production in Dry Regions, vol. 2, London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Barton, L. L., Johnson, G. V. & Orbok Miller, S. (1986). The effect of Azospirillum brasilense on iron absorption and translocation by sorghum. Journal of Plant Nutrition 9, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. (1985). Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2(3), 199–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. & Naveh, M. (1976). Improved water-use efficiency by promoted competition in dryland sorghum. Agronomy Journal 68, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, J. S. & McPherson, H. G. (1975). Physiology of water deficits in cereal crops. Advances in Agronomy 27, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, V. N. & Kanemasu, E. T. (1985). Growth and water use of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and pearl millet (Penniselum americanum (L.) Leeke). Field Crops Research 10, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, J., Hall, D. O., Long, S. P. & Scurlock, J. M. O. (ed.) (1985). Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis, 2nd ed.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. S., Johnson, E. C. & Edmeades, G. O. (1985). Breeding and Selection for Drought Resistance in Tropical Maize. Mexico: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT).Google Scholar
Giller, K. E. & Day, J. M. (1985). Nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere: significance in natural and agricultural systems. In Biological Interaction in Soil (ed. Fitter, A. H.), pp. 137–147. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Hiller, A., Plazin, J. & Von Slyke, D. D. (1948). A study of conditions for Kjeldahl determination of nitrogen in proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 176, 1401–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapulnik, Y., Gafny, R. & Okon, Y. (1985). Effect of Azospirillum spp. inoculation on root development and NO3 uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Miriam) in hydroponic systems. Canadian Journal of Botany 63, 627–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W., Okon, Y. & Hardy, R. W. F. (1983). Enhanced mineral uptake by Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor roots inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45, 1775–1779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, R. J. K., Foale, M. A. & Done, A. A. (1984). Response of grain sorghum to varying irrigation frequency in the Ord irrigation area. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyra, C. A. & Dobereiner, J. (1977). Nitrogen fixation in grasses. Advances in Agronomy 29, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okon, Y., Albrecht, S. L. & Burris, R. H. (1977). Methods for growing Spirillum lipoferum and for counting it in pure culture and in association with plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 33, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okon, Y. & Kapulnik, Y. (1986). Development and function of Azospirillum-inoculated roots. Plant and Soil 90, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarig, S., Kapulnik, Y., Nur, I. & Okon, Y. (1984). Response of non-irrigated Sorghum bicolor to Azospirillum inoculation. Experimental Agriculture 20, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarig, S., Okon, Y. & Blum, A. (1985). Improvement of growth and yield of non-irrigated Sorghum bicolor by Azospirillum inoculation. In Nitrogen Fixation Research Progress (ed. Evans, H. J., Bottomley, P. J. and Newton, N. E.), p. 707. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. E., White, R. H. & Bingham, S. W. (1986). Technique to measure rooting of sods growth in small containers. Agronomy Journal 78, 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Hemmingsen, E. A. & Bradstreet, E. D. (1964). Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 52, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, D. G., Kannagara, T. & Simpson, G. M. (1978). Drought resistance of Sorghum bicolor. 2. Water stress effects on growth. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, T. M., Gaskins, M. H. & Hubbell, D. H. (1979). Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37, 1016–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, N. C. & Purlange, J. Y. (1970). Analysis of operation and calibration of a ventilated diffusion porometer. Plant Physiology 46, 175–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, F. S. & Olsen, S. R. (1965). Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHC04 extracts from soil. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 29, 677–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar