Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:19:45.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dispersion relation for electron waves propagating in an isotropic plasma containing Maxwellian and suprathermal electrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Juan R. Sanmartin
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Té cnica Aeroespacial ‘ Esteban Terradas’, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The paper discusses the dispersion relation for longitudinal electron waves propagating in a collisionless, homogeneous isotropic plasma, which contains both Maxwellian and suprathermal electrons. It is found that the dispersion curve, known to have two separate branches for zero suprathermal energy spread, depends sensitively on this quantity. As the energy half-width of the suprathermal population increases, the branches approach each other until they touch at a connexion point, for a small critical value of that half-width. The topology of the dispersion curves is different for half-widths above and below critical; and this can affect the use of wave-propagation measurements as a diagnostic technique for the determination of the electron distribution function. Both the distance between the branches and spatial damping near the connexion frequency depend on the half-width, if below critical, and can be used to determine it. The theory is applied to experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fried, B. D. & Conte, S. 1961 The Plasma Dispersion Function. Academic.Google Scholar
Henry, D. & Treguier, J. P. 1972 a Phys. Lett. A 38, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. & Treguier, J. P. 1972 b J. Plasma Phys. 8, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. & Treguier, J. P. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Kuehl, H. H., Stewart, G. E. & Yeh, C. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. 1946 J. Phys. USSR, 10, 25.Google Scholar
Le Coquil, E., Henry, D., Le Meur, J. P., Castrec, C. & Treguier, J. P. 1971 Rev. Phys. Appliqué s, 6, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, T. M. & Malmberg, J. H. 1968 Phys. Fluids, 11, 1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treguier, J. P. & Henry, D. 1972 Plasma Phys. 14, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar