Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:54:07.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing epidemiology of cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 Bengal in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. S. G. Faruque ,
G. J. Fuchs  and
M. J. Albert
A. S. G. Faruque
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
G. J. Fuchs
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
M. J. Albert*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
*
* Author for correspondence.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR, B) Dhaka we studied the trends in cholera for the period January 1992 to May 1995. Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal emerged as a second aetiologic agent of cholera in Dhaka in January 1993. In 1993, the majority of cholera cases was due to V. cholerae O139, with V. cholerae O1 accounting for a small proportion of cases. During the latter part of the study period (Jan 1994–May 1995), V. cholerae O1 re-emerged as the predominant cholera strain. The predominant age group affected in endemic cholera due to V. cholerae O1 was children 2–9 years old, and the organism was isolated from more females than from males at all ages. In contrast, cholera due to V. cholerae O139 caused disease mostly in adults 15 years and older, which indicated that this organism was new in this population. As with V. cholerae O1, V. cholerae O139 was isolated from more females than males. The initial rapid emergence and predominance of V. cholerae O139 was considered possibly to herald the start of the eighth pandemic of cholera. However, just after a year, the prevalence of V. cholerae O139 decreased dramatically with V. cholerae O1 resuming the role of the dominant cholera strain. The factor(s) contributing to the dramatic decline in prevalence of V. cholerae O139 is not well understood.

Type
Special Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 116 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 275 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

REFERENCES

1.Khan, MU, Eeckels, R, Alam, AN, Rahman, N. Cholera, rotavirus and ETEC diarrhoea: some clinico-epidemiological features. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1988; 28: 485–8.Google Scholar
2.Ramamurthy, T, Garg, S, Sharma, R et al. , Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India. Lancet 1993; 341: 703–1.Google Scholar
3.Albert, MJ. Personal reflections on the discovery of Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal: A tribute to team work and international collaboration. J. Diarrhoeal Dis Res 1993; 11: 207–10.Google Scholar
4.Albert, MJ, Ansaruzzaman, M, Bardhan, PK et al. , Large epidemic of cholera-like disease in Bangladesh caused by Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal. Lancet 1993; 342: 387–90.Google Scholar
5.Nair, GB, Ramamurthy, T, Bhattacharya, SK et al. , Spread of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal in India. J Infect Dis 1994; 169: 1029–34.Google Scholar
6.Albert, MJ. Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal: minireview. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 2345–9.Google Scholar
7.Swerdlow, DL, Ries, AA. Vibrio cholerae non-O1-the eighth pandemic? Lancet 1993; 342: 382–3.Google Scholar
8.Stoll, BJ, Glass, RI, Huq, MI et al. , Surveillance of patients attending a diarrhoeal disease hospital in Bangladesh. BMJ 1982; 285: 1185–8.Google Scholar
9.Shimada, T, Arakawa, E, Itoh, K et al. , Two strains of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 possessing somatic (O) antigen factors in common with V. cholerae serogroup O139 synonym ‘Bengal’. Curr Microbiol 1994; 29: 331–3.Google Scholar
10.Islam, MS, Hasan, MK, Miah, MA et al. , Isolation of Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal from water in Bangladesh. Lancet 1993; 342: 430.Google Scholar
11.Khan, MU, Shahidullah, M, Haque, MS, Ahmed, WU. Presence of vibrios in surface water and their relation with cholera in a community. Trop Geogr Med 1984; 36: 335–40.Google Scholar
12.Colwell, RR, Spira, WM. The ecology of Vibrio cholerae. In: Barua, D, Greenough, WB III, eds. Cholera. New York: Plenum Press, 1992: 107–27.Google Scholar
13.Glass, RI, Becker, S, Huq, MI et al. , Endemic cholera in rural Bangladesh, 1966–1980. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 959–70.Google Scholar
14.Hossain, MM, Glass, RI. Parental son preference in seeking medical care for children less than five years of age in a rural community in Bangladesh. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 1349–50.Google Scholar