Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:24:41.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Readiness for surgery after axillary block: Single or multiple injection techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2006

Z. J. Koscielniak-Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, AN2034, National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
H. L. Stens-Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, AN2034, National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
F. K. Lippert
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, AN2034, National University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

We have assessed prospectively the time to readiness for surgery following axillary block (sum of block performance and latency times) in 80 patients. The brachial plexus was identified using a nerve stimulator, and anaesthetized with 45 mL of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline 5 μgmL−1. In group 1 (single injection) the whole volume of mepivacaine was injected after locating only one of the plexus nerves. In group 2 (multiple injections) at least three plexus nerves were located, and the volume of mepivacaine was divided between them. Sensory block was assessed by a blinded observer every 10 min. Patchy analgesia was supplemented after electrolocating the unblocked nerves after 20, 30 or 40 min. The patient was pronounced ready for surgery when analgesia was present in all areas to be operated upon, which always included the three nerves to the hand. The single injection technique required less time for block performance (mean 5.5 min) than multiple injections (mean 9.5 min), P < 0.0001. However, latency of the block was longer and the requirement for supplemental nerve blocks was greater, after single injections (33 min and 57%) than after multiple injections (15.5 min and 7%, respectively), P < 0.0001. As a result, readiness for surgery was achieved faster in group 2 (25 min), than in group 1 (38.5 min), p < 0.0001. After supplementation, block effectiveness was 100% in group 1 and 98% in group 2 (NS). The frequency of adverse effects (vessel puncture or paraesthesia) was similar in both groups. No neurological sequelae were observed.We conclude that the multiple injection technique takes longer to perform than single injection, but that readiness for surgery is faster because of shorter block latency and better spread of analgesia.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1997 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)