Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:42:48.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for Campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Kapperud
Affiliation:
National Institute of Public Health, Department of Bacteriology, 0462 Oslo, Norway Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, 0033 Oslo,Norway
E. Skjerve
Affiliation:
Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, 0033 Oslo,Norway
L. Vik
Affiliation:
The Food Inspection Service in Indre Østfold, 1850 Mysen
K. Hauge
Affiliation:
The Food Inspection Service in Sør-Østerdal, 2401 Elverum, Norway
A. Lysaker
Affiliation:
The Food Inspection Service in Indre Østfold, 1850 Mysen
I. Aalmen
Affiliation:
The Food Inspection Service in Sør-Østerdal, 2401 Elverum, Norway
S. M. Ostroff
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
M. Potter
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An epidemiological investigation was conducted to identify risk factors related to hygiene and husbandry practices which determine the introduction of Campylobacter spp. into broiler chicken flocks. All 176 broiler farms in an area in southeastern Norway participated in the study. Each farm was represented by one flock selected at random during a one-year period. The flocks were examined for Campylobacter colonization at slaughter, and the flock managers were sub-sequently interviewed about hygiene and husbandry practices. Campylobacter spp. were recovered from 32 (18%) of the flocks. The proportion of colonized flocks varied geographically and seasonally with a peak in the autumn. The following variables were found to be independently associated with an increased risk of Campylobacter colonization using logistic regression analysis: (i) feeding the broilers undisinfected water (odds ratio (OR) = 3·42, P = 0·045), (ii) tending other poultry prior to entering the broiler house (OR = 6·43, P = 0·007), (iii) tending pigs before entering the house (OR = 4·86, P = 0·037), (iv) geographic region (Hedmark versus Østfold county) (OR = 2·91), P = 0·023, (v) season (autumn versus other seasons) (OR = 3·43, P = 0·008). Presence of rats on the farm was associated with an increased risk, but this factor did not reach statistical significance (OR = 3·96, P = 0·083). Preventive measures should include dis-infection of drinking water and strict hygienic routines when the farm workers enter the rearing room. The results indicated that disinfection of drinking water is the preventive measure most likely to have the greatest impact on the prevalence of Campylobacter among broiler chicken flocks in the study area (population attributable fraction = 0·53).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

REFERENCES

1.Blaser, MJ, Taylor, DN, Feldman, RA. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections. Epidemiol Rev 1983; 5: 157–76.Google Scholar
2.Butzler, J-P, Skirrow, MB. Campylobacter enteritis. Clin Gastroenterol 1979: 8: 737–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Doyle, MP. Campylobacter in foods. In: Butzler, J-P. ed. Campylobacter infections in man and animals. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc. 1984: 163–80.Google Scholar
4.Stern, NJ. Kazmi, SU. Campylobacter jejuni. In: Doyle, MP. ed. Foodborne bacterial pathogens. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1989: 71110.Google Scholar
5.Deming, MS. Tauxe, RV, Blake, PA, et al. Campylobacter enteritis at a university: transmission from eating chicken and from cats. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 526–34.Google Scholar
6.Hopkins, RS. Olmsted, R, Istre, GR. Endemic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: identified risk factors. Am J Publ Hlth 1984; 74: 249–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Kapperud, G, Skjerve, E, Bean, NH, Ostroff, SM, Lassen, J. Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 3117–21.Google Scholar
8.Norkrans, G, Svedhem, Å. Epidemiological aspects of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J Hyg 1982; 89: 163–70.Google Scholar
9.Oosterom, J, den Uyl, CH, Bänffer, JRJ, Huisman, J. Epidemiological investigations on Campylobacter jejuni in households with a primary infection. J Hyg 1984; 92: 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Lindblom, G-B, Sjögren, E, Kaijser, B. Natural Campylobacter colonization in chickens raised under different environmental conditions. J Hyg 1986; 96: 385–91.Google Scholar
11.Shanker, S, Lee, A, Sorrell, TC. Horizontal transmission of Campylobacter jejuni amongst broiler chicks: experimental studies. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 104: 101–10.Google Scholar
12.Sjögren, E, Kaijser, B. Serotyping studies of campylobacter from naturally colonized chickens. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 102: 215–9.Google Scholar
13.Myszewski, MA, Stern, NJ. Influence of Campylobacter jejuni cecal colonization on immunoglobulin response in chickens. Avian Dis 1990; 34: 588–94.Google Scholar
14.Stern, NJ, Meinersmann, RJ, Dickerson, HW. Influence of antibody treatment of Campylobacter jejuni on the dose required to colonize chicks. Avian Dis 1990; 34: 595601.Google Scholar
15.Schoeni, JL, Doyle, MP. Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni colonization of chicks by cecum-colonizing bacteria producing anti-C. jejuni metabolites. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58: 664–70.Google Scholar
16.Stern, NJ, Meinersmann, RJ, Cox, NA, Bailey, JS, Blankenship, LC. Influence of host lineage on cecal colonization by Campylobacter jejuni in chickens. Avian Dis 1990; 34: 602–6.Google Scholar
17.Berndtson, E, Engvall, A. Epidemiological studies of factors affecting the occurrence of Campylobacters in broiler farms. In: Ruiz-Palacios, GM, Calva, E, Ruiz-Palacios, BR, eds. CampylobacterV. Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Campylobacter infections. Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: 1989: 61–2.Google Scholar
18.van de Giessen, A, Mazurier, SI, Jacobs-Reitsma, W, Jansen, W, Berkers, P, Ritmeester, W, Wernars, K. Study on the epidemiology and control of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry broiler flocks. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992; 58: 1913–7.Google Scholar
19.Izat, AL, Gardner, FA. Incidence of Campylobacter jejuni in processed egg products. Poultry Sci 1988; 67: 1431–5.Google Scholar
20.Neill, SD, Campbell, JN, O'Brien, JJ. Egg penetration by Campylobacter jejuni. Avian Pathol 1985; 14: 313–20.Google Scholar
21.Shanker, S, Lee, A, Sorrell, TC. Campylobacter jejuni in broilers: the role of vertical transmission. J Hyg 1986; 96: 153–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Annan-Prah, A, Jane, M. The mode of spread of Campylobacter jejuni/coli to broiler flocks. J Vet Med B 1988; 35: 11–8.Google Scholar
23.Kazwala, RR, Collins, JD, Hannan, J, Crinion, RAP, O'Mahony, H. Factors responsible for the introduction and spread of Campylobacter jejuni infection in commercial poultry production. Vet Rec 1990: 126: 305–6.Google ScholarPubMed
24.Pearson, AD. Colwell, RR. Rollins, DM et al. Transmission of C. jejuni on a poultry farm. In: Kaijser, B. Falsen, E. eds. Campylobacter IV. Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on Campylobacter infections. Göteborg, Sweden: 1988; 281–4.Google Scholar
25.Pearson, AD. Greenwood, M. Healing, TD, Rollins, D, Shahamat, M, Donaldson, J, Colwell, RR. Colonization of broiler chickens by waterborne Campylobacter jejuni. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993; 59: 987–96.Google Scholar
26.Kapperud, G. Aasen, S. Descriptive epidemiology of infections due to thermkotolerant Campylobacter spp. in Norway. 1979–1988. Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand 1992; 100: 883–90.Google Scholar
27.Kapperud, G. Lassen, J, Ostroff, SM, Aasen, S. Clinical features of sporadic Campylobacter infections in Norway. Scand J Infect Dis 1992; 24: 741–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Norwegian Standards Association. Water analysis. Techniques for quantitative determination of microorganisms in water, sediments, and sewage sludge (NS 4790). (In Norwegian). Norwegian Standards Association. Oslo, Norway, 1989.Google Scholar
29.Smilbert, RM. Genus Campylobacter Sebald and Véron 1963. In: Krieg, NR, Holt, JG. eds. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology: vol 1. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1984: 111–8.Google Scholar
30.Skirrow, MB, Benjamin, J. Differentiation of enteropathogenic Campylobacter. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33: 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Martin, SW, Meek, AH, Willeberg, P. Veterinary epidemiology. Ames. Iowa: Iowa State University Press. 1987: 130.Google Scholar
32.Brennhovd, O. Kapperud, G. Langeland, G. Survey of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia spp. in three surface water sources in Norway. Int J Food Microbiol 1992: 15: 327–38.Google Scholar
33.Harris, NV, Thompson, D, Martin, DC. Nolan, CM. A survey of Campylobacter and other bacterial contaminants of pre-market chicken and retail poultry and meats, King County, Washington. Am J Publ Hlth 1986: 76: 401–6.Google Scholar
34.Rollins, DM. Colwell, RR. Viable but nonculturable stage of Campylobacter jejuni and its role in survival in the natural aquatic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 52: 531–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Rosef, O. Gondrosen, B. Kapperud, G, Underdal, B. Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from domestic and wild mammals in Norway. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 46: 855–9.Google Scholar
36.Rosef, O. Gondrosen, B. Kapperud, G. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli as surface contaminants of fresh and frozen poultry carcasses. Int J Food Microbiol 1984; 1: 205–15.Google Scholar
37.Stern, NJ, Bailey, JS, Blankenship, LC, Cox, NA, McHan, F. Colonization characteristics of Campylobacter jejuni in chick ceca. Avian Dis 1988; 32: 330–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed