Epidemiology and Infection



How safe is safer sex? High levels of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in female sex workers in London


J. FOX a1c1, G. P. TAYLOR a1, S. DAY a2, J. PARRY a3 and H. WARD a4
a1 Department of Genitourinary Medicine and Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, UK
a2 Department of Anthropology, Goldsmith's College, University of London, UK
a3 Sexually Transmitted and Bloodborne Virus Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, London, UK
a4 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, UK

Article author query
fox j   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 
taylor gp   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 
day s   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 
parry j   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 
ward h   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 

Abstract

Female sex workers in Europe have low levels of sexually transmitted infections, attributable to condom use. The aim of this paper is to describe the seroepidemiology of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in female sex workers in London by using a 15-year prospective study of 453 sex workers. The seroprevalence of HSV-1 was 74·4% and independently associated with birth in a ‘transitional country’ (OR 5·4, 95% CI 1·61–18·20). The seroprevalence of HSV-2 was 60% and declined over time; it was also independently associated with time in sex work (OR 2·12, 95% CI 1·23–3·65) and birth in a ‘developing country’ (OR 2·95, 95% CI 1·34–6·48). We show that a cohort of sex workers with extensive condom use and little known sexually transmitted infection have high levels of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infection, suggesting that condoms may not be universally protective. Sex workers are candidates for HSV vaccine efficacy or intervention studies.

(Accepted January 11 2006)
(Published Online March 29 2006)


Correspondence:
c1 Clinical Trials Centre, Winston Churchill Building, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital Campus, London W2 1PG. (Email: Julie.fox@imperial.ac.uk)


Metrics