Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T12:35:36.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Precambrian–Cambrian boundary beds in Morocco (Preliminary Report)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

K. Sdzuy
Affiliation:
Paläontologisches Institut der Universität Würzburg, 8700 Würzburg, Pleichewall 1, Bundes Republik Deutschland

Summary

In the Anti-Atlas, trilobites occur below the zone of Fallotaspis tazemmourtensis of Hupé (1953) and even somewhat below the first archaeocyathids of the region. Most of them are opisthoparions (Hupetina gen.nov is described), and the olenellid Eofallotaspis gen.nov. probably is ancestral to Fallotaspis. The age is concluded not be younger than the lower Atdabanian of the Siberian platform. In the High Atlas, in the area called Ounein, a complete succession of trilobites from the low Lower Cambrian through the Middle Cambrian is being studied. The oldest trilobites encountered here are referred to the new genus Lemdadella. Correlation with the Anti-Atlas or other regions is uncertain.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boudda, A. 1968. Zur geologischen Kartierung 1:25,000 im Gebiet von Ounein (Massif ancien du Haut-Atlas, Marokko). Master's thesis, Würzburg.Google Scholar
Boudda, A. & Choubert, G. 1972. Sur la limite inférieure du Cambrien au Maroc. C. r. hebd. séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris D, 58.Google Scholar
Choubert, G. 1953. Le Précambrien III et le Géorgien de l'Anti-Atlas. Notes Mém. Serv. géol. 103, 739.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & M. Archaeocyathid fauna of the lowest fossiliferous levels of Tiout (Lower Cambrian-Southern Morocco). Unpubl. report for the Precambrian/Cambrian boundary working group, 22p., 4 pls.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1972. Lower Cambrian trilobites from the Sekwi Formation Type Section, Mackenzie Mountains, North-western Canada. Bull. geol. Surv. Can. 212, 158, figs 1–2.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1953. Contribution à l'étude du Cambrien inférieur et du Précambrien III de l'Anti-Atlas marocain. Protectorat République franç. Maroc. Serv. géol., Not. Mém. 103, 1402.Google Scholar
Hupé, P. 1960. Sur le Cambrien inférieur du Maroc. Int. geol. Congr. 21. Sess., 8, pp. 7585.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1958. The Cambrian trilobite Redlichia: organization and generic concept. Bur. Miner. Resources, Geol., Geophys. 42, 137.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1957. Ontogenetic development of two olenellid trilobites. J. Paleont. 31, 105–28.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N. 1966. Trilobity niznego kembrija juga Sibiri (nadsemejstvo Redlichioidea), I. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Trud Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Sib. Otd. pp. 1203.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N. 1969. Trilobity niznego i srednego kembrija juga Sibiri (nadsemejstvo Redlichioidea), II. Akad Nauk SSSR, Trud Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Sib. Otd. 67, 1108.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1973. Regularities in the morphological evolution of regular Archaeocyathean and problems of the Lower Cambrian stage division. (In Russian.) Trans. Geol. Inst. Acad. Sci. 241, 1163.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. & Debrenne, F. 1974. Age of Archaeocyathid assemblages. Amer. J. Sci. 274, 833–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suvorova, N. P. 1960. Trilobity Kembrija vostoka sibirskoj platformy 2, Olenellidy–Granulariidy. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Trud paleont. Inst. 84, 1238.Google Scholar