Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:49:39.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philip Riley, Language, culture and identity. London: Continuum, 2007. Pp. ix, 265. Pb. $49.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2009

Brook Hefright
Brook Hefright*
Affiliation:
Linguistics, University of MichiganAnn Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A. hefright@umich.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Language in Society , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amossy, Ruth (ed.) (1999). Images de soi dans le discourse: La construction sociale de l’ethos. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Holquist, Michael (ed.), Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, & Cooper, Frederick (2000). Beyond “identity.” Theory and Society 29:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33:469–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7:585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1939). The civilising process. Edmund, Jephcott (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of language, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:243–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livia, Anna, & Hall, Kira (1997). “It’s a girl!”: Bringing performativity back to linguistics. In Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira (eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender and sexuality, 3–18. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1936). Ideology and utopia. Edward, Shils (trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marui, Ichiro et al. (1996). Concepts of communicative virtues (CCV) in Japanese and German. In Hellinger, Marlis & Ammon, Ulrich (eds.), Contrastive sociolinguistics, 385–409. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel (1938). Une catégorie de l’ésprit humain: La notion de personne, celle de ‘Moi.’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 68:263–81.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi (1983). Acquiring conversational competence. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi (1984). Language acquisition and socialisation: Three developmental stories and their implications. In Shweder, Richard A. & LeVine, Robert A. (eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion, 276–320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi (eds.). (1986). Language socialisation across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1955 [1940]. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Buchler, Justus (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce: Selected writings. 98–115New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred (1944). The Stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology 29:499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred (1964). Studies in social theory, collected papers. Broderson, Arvid (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith H. & Selby, Henry A. (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, John A. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23:193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg(1950 [1908]). The Stranger. In Wolff, Kurt H. (trans., ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel, 402–8. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. (2003). The world as India. Times Literary Supplement, 13 June.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar