Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:00:36.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chromatophores and Body Patterning in the Squid Alloteuthis Subulata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C.J. Cornwell
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN and Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB.
J.B. Messenger
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN and Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB.
R.T. Hanlon
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543–1015, USA

Extract

The chromatophore system of the small loliginid squid Alloteuthis subulata (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) is very simple and the repertoire of body patterns limited. There are red and yellow chromatophores only. On the dorsal mantle there are more yellows than reds; on the ventral mantle and there are more reds than yellows. The dorsal reds are larger than the yellows and bear more radial muscles. The significance of these findings is discussed.

Alloteuthis subulata Lamarck is a small loliginid, common in shallow water near Plymouth (Holme, 1974; Lipinski, 1985; Rodhouse et al., 1988). Little is known of its natural history and behaviour and chromatophores and body patterns of adults have never been described, although the skin of this species has been used in physiological studies of colour change (Messenger, 1991; Messenger et al., 1991; Cornwell & Messenger, 1995).

Over 100 adult animals of both sexes, caught by trawl at depths of 10–60 m, were examined; their mantle lengths ranged from 70 to 130 mm. Living animals were observed in large aquaria with circulating sea-water. Counts and measurements of chromatophores were made on colour photographs (taken through a Nikon dissecting microscope) of pieces of fresh skin (20×20 mm) dissected from animals killed by decapitation or after MgCl2 anaesthesia (Messenger et al., 1985). Chromatophores were counted first when fully retracted (by 1×10−3 M 5-HT) and then when fully expanded (with 1×10−3 M L-glutamate: Cornwell & Messenger, 1995). All measurements were made in the same area of the body: the central and anterior part of the mantle, dorsally and ventrally (Figure 2).

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cloney, R. A. & Brocco, S.L., 1983. Chromatophore organs, reflector cells, iridocytes and leucophores in cephalopods. American Zoologist, 23, 581592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, C.J. & Messenger, J.B., 1995. Neurotransmitters of squid chromatophores. In Cephalopod Neurobiology (ed. N.J., Abbott et al.), pp. 369379. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cott, H.B., 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Metnuen.Google Scholar
Denton, E.J. & Land, M.F., 1971. Mechanism of reflexion in silver layers of fish and cephalopods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 178, 4361.Google Scholar
Dubas, F., Hanlon, R.T., Ferguson, G.P. & Pinsker, H.M., 1986. Localization and stimulation of chromatophore motoneurones in the brain of the squid, Lolliguncula brevis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 121, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, G.P., Messenger, J.B. & Budelmann, B.U., 1994. Gravity and light influence the countershading reflexes of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 191, 247256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanlon, R.T., 1982. The functional organization of chromatophores and iridescent cells in the body patterning of Loligo plei (Cephalopoda: Myopsida). Malacologia, 23, 89119.Google Scholar
Hanlon, R.T. & Messenger, J.B., 1988. Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.): the morphology and development of body patterns and their relation to behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 320, 437487.Google Scholar
Hanlon, R.T. & Messenger, J.B., 1996. Cephalopod behaviour. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holme, N.A., 1974. The biology of Loligo forbesi Steenstrup (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the Plymouth area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 481503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipinski, M.R., 1985. Laboratory survival of Alloteuthis subulata (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) from the Plymouth area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 845855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, J.B., 1991. Transmitters, toxins and phylogeny. Journal of Zoology, 223, 687694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, J.B., 1995. Current issues in cephalopod behaviour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 507514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, J.B., Katayama, Y., Ogden, D.C., Corrie, J.E.T. & Trentham, D.R., 1991. Photolytic release of glutamate from ‘caged’ glutamate expands squid chromatophores. Journal of Physiology, 438, 293.Google Scholar
Messenger, J.B., Nixon, N. & Ryan, K.P., 1985. Magnesium chloride as an anaesthetic for cephalopods. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 82C, 203205.Google ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, M., 1975. Conservatism of displays and comparable stereotyped patterns among cephalopods. In Function and evolution in behaviour. Essays in honour of Professor Niko Tinbergen, FRS (ed. G., Baerends et al.), pp. 276291. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Packard, A. & Hochberg, F.G., 1977. Skin patterning in Octopus and other genera. Symposia of the Zoological Society, 38, 191231.Google Scholar
Packard, A. & Sanders, G., 1969. What the octopus shows to the world. Endeavour, 28, 9299.Google ScholarPubMed
Rodhouse, P.G., Swinfen, R.C. & Murray, A.W.A., 1988. Life cycle, demography and reproductive investment in the myopsid squid Alloteuthis subulata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 45, 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar