Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T15:23:41.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A preliminary check-list of British marine diatoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. Ingram Hendey
Affiliation:
Royal Naval Scientific Service

Extract

The present list of diatoms may be considered an extension of the recent check-list of British marine algae by Parke (1953). It includes not only truly marine species, both sessile and planktonic, but also species inhabiting brackish waters with a few fresh-water species that manage to live, though somewhat precariously, in estuarine conditions.

It has been compiled for the following reasons: (1) to indicate the extent of the diatom flora around British coasts, so that comparisons may be made with that of the other countries; (2) to assist workers in the identification of material by indicating the size of any genus known to inhabit our shores; (3) to check the arrival of new entrants to the British flora; and (4) to provide a basis for a more detailed work, now in preparation. The check-list does not presume to lay down finalized decisions on the taxonomic rank ascribed to any organism or to consider the criteria upon which such ranks are based.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

W, Bailey J.., 1854 [1855]. Notes on new species and localities of microscopic organisms. Smithson. Contr. Knowl., Vol. 7, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Boyer, C. S., 1927. Synopsis of North American Diatomaceae. Pt. 1. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., Vol. 78, suppl.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1873. Examination of diatoms found on the surface of the sea of Java. Bih. svensk. Vetensk Akad. Handl., Bd. 1, Nr II, 13 pp., 3 pl.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1894–5. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Pt. 1. 1894, K. svenska Vetensk Akad. Handl., n.f., Bd. 26, Nr 2, 194 pp., pis. I-V. Pt. II. 1895, Bd. 27, Nr 3, 220 pp., pis. I–IV.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T. & Grunow, A., 1880. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der arctischen Diatomeen. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Bd. 17, Nr 2.Google Scholar
Cleve-Euler, A., 1951. Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., Bd. 2, Nr 1.Google Scholar
De Toni, G. B., 1894. Sylloge Algarum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Vol. 2, Sect. 3: Bacillarieae, Cryptorhaphideae. Patavia.Google Scholar
Gran, H. H., 1905. Diatomeen. Nord. Plankt., (Bot.), Abt. 19, 146 pp.Google Scholar
Gregory, W. 1856–7. On the Post-Tertiary diatomaceous sand of Glenshira, Part II. Containing an account of a number of additional undescribed species. Trans. micr. Soc. Lond., N.S., Vol. 4, pp. 3548 (1856)5 Vol. 5, pp. 67–88 (1857).Google Scholar
Gregory, W. 1857. On new forms of marine Diatomaceae found in the Firth of Clyde and in Loch Fine. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 21, pp. 473542.Google Scholar
Hassall, A. H., 1845. History of the British Freshwater Algae. Diatomaceae;, Vol. 1, 395439, Vol. 2, 21–4. London.Google Scholar
Hassall, A. H., 1850. A microscopic examination of the water supplied to the inhabitants of London and the surburban districts.Google Scholar
Ingram, Hendey N., 1937. The plankton diatoms of the southern seas. ‘DiscoveryRep., Vol. 16, pp. 151364.Google Scholar
Ingram, Hendey N., 1951. Littoral diatoms of Chichester Harbour with special reference to fouling. J.R. micr. Soc, Vol. 71, pp. 186, pis. 1–18. London.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1927–30. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz usw. Rabenhorst, Kryptogamen-Flora, Bd. 7, Teil 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1935. Untersuchungen über den Bau der Diatomeen. X & XI. Die sogenannten Langslinien in der Schalenstruktur pennater Diatomeen. Ber. dtsch. hot. Ges., Bd. 53, pp. 3–41.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1833. Algarwn aquae dulcis Germanicarum. Decas 1.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1844. Die Kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. 152 pp., pis. I–XXX, Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1930. The planktonic diatoms of northern seas. Ray Soc. Publ., No. 116, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Mann, A., 1907. Report on the diatoms of the Albatross voyages in the Pacific Ocean, 1888–1904. Contrib. U.S. nat. Herb., Vol. 10, pp. 221419, pis. XLIV–LIV.Google Scholar
Parke, Mary, 1953. A preliminary check-list of British marine Algae. J. Mar. biol. Soc, U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 497520.Google Scholar
Peragallo, H., 1891. Monographic du genre Pleurosigma et des genres allies. Le Diatomiste, Vol. 1, suppl., 35 pp., pis. I–X.Google Scholar
Peragallo, H. & M., 1897–1908. Diatomees marines de France. Grez-sur-Loing.Google Scholar
Pritchard, A., 1861. History of the Infusoria. 4th Edition. [Diatoms by J. Ralfs.] London.Google Scholar
Rattray, J., 1888. A revision of the genus Auliscus Ehrb. and some allied genera. J.R. micr. Soc, Vol. 8, pp. 861920.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1853. A Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae. Vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1856. A Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Van Heurck, H., 1880–5. Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Atlas (1880–3), Texte (1885), Pls. I–CXXXII (1880–3); Table Alphabétique, pp. 1–120 (1884); Texte pp. 1–235, Pis. A-C (1885). Anvers.Google Scholar
Van Heurck, H., 1896. A treatise on the Diatomaceae. London. [ Trans. Baxter, W. E..]Google Scholar