Behavioral and Brain Sciences



Open Peer Commentary

Operant contingencies and “near-money”


Simon Kemp a1 and Randolph C. Grace a1
a1 Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand simon.kemp@canterbury.ac.nz randolph.grace@canterbury.ac.nz

Article author query
kemp s   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 
grace rc   [PubMed][Google Scholar] 

Abstract

We make two major comments. First, negative reinforcement contingencies may generate some apparent “drug-like” aspects of money motivation, and the operant account, properly construed, is both a tool and drug theory. Second, according to Lea & Webley (L&W), one might expect that “near-money,” such as frequent-flyer miles, should have a stronger drug and a weaker tool aspect than regular money. Available evidence agrees with this prediction.

(Published Online April 5 2006)