Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:02:48.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new species of Angiostrongylus in an Australian rat, Rattus fuscipes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Manoon Bhaibulaya
Manoon Bhaibulaya
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A survey of lungworm infection in rats in Queensland has shown that 23% of Rattus norvegicus, 6·5% of R. rattus 4·5% of R. fuscipes and 0% of Melomys cervinipes were infected with lungworms. Detailed examination of the lungworms revealed that there are two distinct species; one is Angiostrongylus cantonensis which was found to occur in R. norvegicus and R. rattus, the other is a new species, namely, A. mackerrasae, which was found in R. fuscipes in an area of rainforest near Brisbane. Some R. norvegicus in Brisbane also harboured A. mackerrasae. The two species were distinguished by the length of the spicules, relative length and appearance of the postero-lateral ray in the male, the presence of a minute projection at the tip of the tail in the female, length of the vagina and the distance between anus and vulva. The first-stage larvae of the two species were found to be identical. As this species has been found to be the only lungworm in R. fuscipes which is an indigenous Australian rat, it is suggested that A. mackerrasae may have originated in the Australian region.

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Professor J. F. A. Sprent and Dr L. R. Ash for their advice and encouragement during this study. Special thanks are also due to Miss M. Cremin for her assistance and to Mr H. Lavery for providing specimens from North Queensland. This work was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare No. A 107023–02.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 789 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, L. R. (1967). Angiostrongylus michiganensis n.sp. (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea), a lungworm occurring in the shrew, Sorex cinereus cinereus in Michigan. J. Parasit. 53, 625–9.Google Scholar
Baillet, C. C. (1866). Helminthes. N. Dict. Prat. Méd. Vét. 8, 519–687.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1928). On a collection of nematodes from Nigerian mammals (chiefly rodents). Parasitology 20, 280–304.Google Scholar
Biocca, E. (1957). Angiostrongylus chabaudi n.sp., parassita del cuore e dei vasi polmonari del gatto selvatico (Felis silvestris). Atti Accad. naz. Lincei Rc. Série 8, 22, 526–32.Google Scholar
Chen, H. T. (1935). Un nouveau nématode pulmonaire, Pulmonema cantonensis n.g., n.sp., des rats de Canton, Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 13, 312–17.Google Scholar
Dougherty, E. C. (1946). The genus Aelurostrongylus, Cameron 1927 (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae), and its relatives; with the description of Parafilaroides, gen. nov., and Angiostrongylus gubernaculatus, sp.nov. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 13, 16–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Goncalves, P. C. (1961). Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866), novo parasito do cão no Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). (Nematoda, Metastrongylidae). Revta Fac. Agron. Vet. Univ. Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 4, 35–40.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. (1958). Catalogue of Australian mammals and their recorded internal parasites. I–IV. Part II. Eutheria. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 83, 126–43.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. & Sandars, D. F. (1955). The life history of the rat lung-worm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Aust. J. Zool. 3, 1–21.Google Scholar
Ogren, R. E. (1954). A lung worm, Angiostrongylus blarini, n.sp. from the short-tailed shrew, with observations on the histopathology and life history. J. Parasit. 40, 681–5.Google Scholar
Prommindaroj, K., Leelawongs, N. & Pradatsundarasar, A. (1962). Human Angiostrongyliasis of the eye in Bangkok Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 11, 759–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railliet, P. R. & Henry, A. (1913). Contribution à l'étude des Nématodes parasites de l'œil du chien. Bull. Soc. cent. Méd. Vét. 67, 209–15.Google Scholar
Soltys, A. (1953). Helminthofauna ryjowkowatych (Soricidae) Bialowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Acta parasit. pol. 1, 353–402.Google Scholar
Tate, G. H. (1951). Results of the Archbold Expeditions No. 65. The rodents of Australia and New Guinea. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 97, 189–430.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1927). Nematodes novos. Bolm Biol. Lab. Parasit. Fac. Med. S. Paulo 6, 52–61.Google Scholar
Weinstein, P. P., Rosen, L., Laqueur, G. L. & Sawyer, T. K. (1963). Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in rats and rhesus monkeys, and observations on the survival of the parasite in vitro. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 12, 358–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguti, S. (1941). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 35. Mammalian nematodes, II. Jap. J Zool. 9, 409–39.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1961). Systema Helminthum, Vol. 3, Part I, 679 pp. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Yokogawa, S. (1937). A new species of nematode found in the lungs of rats, Haemostrongylus ratti n.sp. Trans. nat. Hist. Soc. Formosa 27, 247–50.Google Scholar