Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:04:04.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early relations between lexical and grammatical development in very immature Italian preterms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2006

ALESSANDRA SANSAVINI ,
ANNALISA GUARINI ,
ROSINA ALESSANDRONI ,
GIACOMO FALDELLA ,
GIULIANA GIOVANELLI  and
GIANPAOLO SALVIOLI
ALESSANDRA SANSAVINI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bologna University
ANNALISA GUARINI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bologna University
ROSINA ALESSANDRONI
Affiliation:
Institute of Neonatology and Paediatrics, Bologna University
GIACOMO FALDELLA
Affiliation:
Institute of Neonatology and Paediatrics, Bologna University
GIULIANA GIOVANELLI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bologna University
GIANPAOLO SALVIOLI
Affiliation:
Institute of Neonatology and Paediatrics, Bologna University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate early lexical and grammatical development and their relations in a sample of very immature healthy preterms, in order to assess whether their linguistic development was typical, at risk or atypical. The effects of biological factors and parental level of education on preterms' linguistic development were also investigated. Seventy-three Italian preterms and 22 Italian fullterms (control sample) were assessed at 2;6 with an Italian test of repetition of sentences (TRF). Their mothers completed the Italian version of the MacArthur questionnaire (PVB). Our results showed that most of the preterm sample displayed a typical development, compared with the fullterms, with lexicon and grammar within the normal range and a normal relation between these competencies. However, preterms characterized by an extremely low birthweight (ELBW), a very low gestational age and male gender were at risk, with slight delays in the lexicon and grammar, but still retaining the normal relation between the two.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 199 - 216
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by research grants from the University of Bologna (Basic Oriented Research ex 60% 1999; University Research Project 1998–2000). We would like to thank Mara Armaroli and Francesca Ruffilli for their help with the data collection; Maria Grazia Capretti, Silvia Galletti, Vittoria Paoletti and Anna Maria Perrone for their help with the medical examination; the children and parents for their participation in the research. We would also like to thank Maria Cristina Caselli and Antonella Devescovi for their precious suggestions concerning the questionnaire and the test used in the research and Roberto Bolzani for statistical advice. Thanks also to the reviewers for their perceptive comments. Finally, we are grateful to Annette Karmiloff-Smith for her careful comments and helpful suggestions.