Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:14:38.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human sperm accumulation near surfaces: a simulation study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

D. J. SMITH*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, College of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Reproductive Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Centre for Human Reproductive Science, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
E. A. GAFFNEY
Affiliation:
Centre for Human Reproductive Science, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB, UK
J. R. BLAKE
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, College of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Centre for Human Reproductive Science, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
J. C. KIRKMAN-BROWN
Affiliation:
Reproductive Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK Centre for Human Reproductive Science, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: D.J.Smith.2@bham.ac.uk

Abstract

A hybrid boundary integral/slender body algorithm for modelling flagellar cell motility is presented. The algorithm uses the boundary element method to represent the ‘wedge-shaped’ head of the human sperm cell and a slender body theory representation of the flagellum. The head morphology is specified carefully due to its significant effect on the force and torque balance and hence movement of the free-swimming cell. The technique is used to investigate the mechanisms for the accumulation of human spermatozoa near surfaces. Sperm swimming in an infinite fluid, and near a plane boundary, with prescribed planar and three-dimensional flagellar waveforms are simulated. Both planar and ‘elliptical helicoid’ beating cells are predicted to accumulate at distances of approximately 8.5–22 μm from surfaces, for flagellar beating with angular wavenumber of 3π to 4π. Planar beating cells with wavenumber of approximately 2.4π or greater are predicted to accumulate at a finite distance, while cells with wavenumber of approximately 2π or less are predicted to escape from the surface, likely due to the breakdown of the stable swimming configuration. In the stable swimming trajectory the cell has a small angle of inclination away from the surface, no greater than approximately 0.5°. The trapping effect need not depend on specialized non-planar components of the flagellar beat but rather is a consequence of force and torque balance and the physical effect of the image systems in a no-slip plane boundary. The effect is relatively weak, so that a cell initially one body length from the surface and inclined at an angle of 4°–6° towards the surface will not be trapped but will rather be deflected from the surface. Cells performing rolling motility, where the flagellum sweeps out a ‘conical envelope’, are predicted to align with the surface provided that they approach with sufficiently steep angle. However simulation of cells swimming against a surface in such a configuration is not possible in the present framework. Simulated human sperm cells performing a planar beat with inclination between the beat plane and the plane-of-flattening of the head were not predicted to glide along surfaces, as has been observed in mouse sperm. Instead, cells initially with the head approximately 1.5–3 μm from the surface were predicted to turn away and escape. The simulation model was also used to examine rolling motility due to elliptical helicoid flagellar beating. The head was found to rotate by approximately 240° over one beat cycle and due to the time-varying torques associated with the flagellar beat was found to exhibit ‘looping’ as has been observed in cells swimming against coverslips.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, J. P. & Macnab, R. M. 1987 Unidirectional, intermittent rotation of the flagellum of rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 169 (2), 514518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltz, J. M., Katz, D. F. & Cone, R. A. 1988 Mechanics of sperm–egg interaction at the zona pellucida. Biophys. J. 54, 643654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, J. R. 1971 A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no slip boundary. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 70, 303310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. R. & Chwang, A. T. 1974 Fundamental singularities of viscous flow. Part 1. Image systems in the vicinity of a stationary no-slip boundary. J. Engng Math. 8, 2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokaw, C. J. 1965 Non-sinusoidal bending waves of sperm flagella. J. Exp. Biol. 43, 155169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brokaw, C. J. 1970 Bending moments in free-swimming flagella. J. Exp. Biol. 53, 445464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brokaw, C. J. 1972 Computer simulation of flagellar movement I. Demonstration of stable bend propagation and bend initiation by a sliding filament model. Biophys. J. 12, 564586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brokaw, C. J. 1985 Computer simulation of flagellar movement VI. Simple curvature-controlled models are incompletely specified. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 48, 633642.Google ScholarPubMed
Brokaw, C. J. 2002 Computer simulation of flagellar movement VII. Coordination of dynein by local curvature control can generate helical bending waves. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 53, 102124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1971 A note on the helical movement of micro-organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 178 (1052), 327346.Google ScholarPubMed
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1975 Hydrodynamics of the low-Reynolds-number flows. Part 2. The singularity method for Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 787815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. J., Jensen, O. E., Billingham, J. & Williams, P. M. 2006 Three-dimensional flow due to a microcantilever oscillating near a wall: an unsteady slender-body analysis. Proc. R. Soc. A 462, 913933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortez, R. 2001 The method of regularized stokeslets. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23 (4), 12041225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortez, R., Fauci, L. & Medovikov, A. 2005 The method of regularized stokeslets in three dimensions: Analysis, validation and application to helical swimming. Phys. Fluids 17 (031504), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosson, J., Huitorel, P. & Gagnon, C. 2003 How spermatozoa come to be confined to surfaces. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 54, 5663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, R. G. 1970 The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, R. H., Fauci, L. J., Omoto, C. & Yang, X. 2007 Fluid dynamic models of flagellar and ciliary beating. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1101, 494505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dresdner, R. D. & Katz, D. F. 1981 Relationships of mammalian sperm motility and morphology to hydrodynamic aspects of cell function. Biol. Reprod. 25, 920930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dresdner, R. D., Katz, D. F. & Berger, S. A. 1980 The propulsion by large amplitude waves of uniflagellar micro-organisms of finite length. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 591621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drobnis, E. Z., Yudin, A. I., Cherr, G. N. & Katz, D. F. 1988 Hamster sperm penetration of the zona pellucida: kinematic analysis and mechanical implications. Dev. Biol. 130 (1), 311323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauci, L. & McDonald, A. 1995 Sperm motility in the presence of boundaries. Bull. Math. Biol. 57 (5), 679699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulford, G. R., Katz, D. F. & Powell, R. L. 1998 Swimming of spermatozoa in a linear viscoelastic fluid. Biorheology 35 (4–5), 295309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. 1953 Undulatory propulsion. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 94 (4), 551578.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1955 The movement of sea urchin spermatozoa. J. Exp. Biol. 32 (4), 775801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. & Hancock, G. J. 1955 The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. J. Exp. Biol. 32 (4), 802814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueron, S. & Levit-Gurevich, K. 2001 A three-dimensional model for ciliary motion based on the internal 9+2 structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 599607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueron, S. & Liron, N. 1992 Ciliary motion modeling, and dynamic multicilia interactions. Biophys. J. 63, 10451058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gueron, S. & Liron, N. 1993 Simulations of three-dimensional ciliary beats and cilia interactions. Biophys. J. 65, 499507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, G. J. 1953 The self-propulsion of microscopic organisms through liquids. Proc. R. Soc. B 217, 96121.Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1979 a A hydrodynamic analysis of flagellar propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 685711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1979 b The hydrodynamics of flagellar propulsion: helical waves. J. Fluid Mech. 94 (2), 331351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, M. & Blum, J. J. 1978 Bend propagation in flagella. I. Derivation of equations of motion and their simulation. Biophys. J. 23 (2), 4157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hines, M. & Blum, J. J. 1983 Three-dimensional mechanics of eukaryotic flagella. Biophys. J. 41, 6779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishijima, S., Hamaguchi, M. S., Naruse, M., Ishijima, S. A. & Hamaguchi, Y. 1992 Rotational movement of a spermatozoon about its long axis. J. Exp. Biol. 163, 1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishijima, S., Oshio, S. & Mohri, H. 1986 Flagellar movement of human spermatozoa. Gamete Res. 13, 185197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E. 1977 Slender body theory for stokes flow and flagellar hydrodynamics. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. 1980 An improved slender-body theory for Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 99 (2), 411431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E. & Brokaw, C. J. 1979 A comparison between resistive-force theory and slender-body theory. Biophys. J. 25 (1), 113127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, D. F., Blake, J. R. & Pavieri-Fontana, S. L. 1975 On the movement of slender bodies near plane boundaries at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 72 (3), 529540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. F., Overstreet, J. W., Samuels, S. J., Niswander, P. W., Bloom, T. D. & Lewis, E. L. 1986 Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male infertility. J. Androl. 7 (4), 203210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinukawa, M., Ohmuro, J., Baba, S. A., Murashige, S., Okuno, M., Nagata, M. & Aoki, F. 2005 Analysis of flagellar bending in hamster spermatozoa: characterisation of an effective stroke. Biol. Reprod. 73 (6), 12691274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauga, E. 2007 Propulsion in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys. Fluids 19, 083104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauga, E., DiLuzio, W. R., Whitesides, G. M. & Stone, H. A. 2006 Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. Biophys. J. 90 (2), 400412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lighthill, M. J. 1975 Mathematical biofluiddynamics. In SIAM Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1976 Flagellar hydrodynamics. The Jon von Neumann lecture. SIAM Rev. 18 (2), 161230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1996 a Helical distributions of stokeslets. J. Engng Math. 30 (1–2), 3578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1996 b Reinterpreting the basic theorem of flagellar hydrodynamics. J. Engng Math. 30 (1–2), 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liron, N. 2001 The LGL (Lighthill–Gueron–Liron) Theorem–historical perspective and critique. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 24, 15331540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liron, N. & Mochon, S. 1976 The discrete-cilia approach to propulsion of ciliated micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 593607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, K. E. 1958 Wave propagation along flagella. J. Exp. Biol. 35 (4), 796806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, K. E. 1963 The control and synchronisation of flagellar movement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 158 (970), 88104.Google Scholar
O'Neill, M. E. & Stewartson, K. 1967 On the slow motion of a sphere parallel to a nearby wall. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 705724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orme, B. A. A., Blake, J. R. & Otto, S. R. 2001 Modelling the motion of particles around choanoflagellates. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oseen, C. W. 1927 Hydrodynamik. Leipzig Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Phan-Thien, N., Tran-Cong, T. & Ramia, M. 1987 A boundary-element analysis of flagellar propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 533549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pironneau, O. & Katz, D. F. 1974 Optimal swimming of flagellated micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 391415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 2002 A Practical Guide to Boundary-Element Methods with the Software Library BEMLIB. Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramia, M., Tullock, D. L. & Phan-Thien, N. 1993 The role of hydrodynamic interaction in the locomotion of microorganisms. Biophys. J. 65, 755778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rikmenspoel, R. 1965 The tail movement of bull spermatozoa. Observations and model calculations. Biophys. J. 5, 365392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothschild, L. 1963 Non-random distribution of bull spermatozoa in a drop of sperm suspension. Nature 198 (12211222).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, W. B., Hinch, E. J., Leal, L. G. & Tieffenbruck, G. 1977 Rods falling near a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 83 (2), 273287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J. S., Tam, P. Y., Shack, W. J. & Lardner, T. J. 1975 Large amplitude motion of self-propelling slender filaments at low Reynolds numbers. J. Biomech. 8, 229236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. J., Blake, J. R. & Gaffney, E. A. 2008 Fluid mechanics of nodal flow due to embryonic primary cilia. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 567573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. J., Gaffney, E. A. & Blake, J. R. 2007 Discrete cilia modelling with singularity distributions: application to the embryonic node and the airway surface liquid. Bull. Math. Biol. 69 (5), 14771510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1951 Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 209, 447461.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1952 The action of waving cylindrical tails in propelling microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 211 (1105), 225239.Google Scholar
Vernon, G. G. & Woolley, D. M. 1999 Three dimensional motion of avian spermatozoa. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 42, 149161.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigeant, M. A. S., Ford, R. M., Wagner, M. & Tamm, L. K. 2002 Reversible and irreversible adhesion of motile escherichia coli cells analyzed by total internal reflection aqueous fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 (6), 27942801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winet, H., Bernstein, G. S. & Head, J. 1984 Observations on the response of human spermatozoa to gravity, boundaries and fluid shear. Reproduction 70, 511523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, D. P., Blasco, L., Khan, M. A. & Litt, M. 1977 Human cervical mucus. I. Rheologic characteristics. Fertil. Steril. 28 (1), 4146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolley, D. M. 1977 Evidence for ‘twisted plane’ undulations in golden hamster sperm tails. J. Cell Biol. 75, 851865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolley, D. M. 2003 Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. Reproduction 126, 259270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolley, D. M. & Vernon, G. G. 2001 A study of helical and planar waves on sea-urchin sperm flagella, with a theory of how they are generated. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 13331345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed