Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T00:01:18.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOW INVOLVED ARE AMERICAN L2 LEARNERS OF SPANISH IN LEXICAL INPUT PROCESSING TASKS DURING READING?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Diana Pulido
Diana Pulido*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
*
*Address correspondence to: Diana Pulido, Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic, Asian, and African Languages, Michigan State University, A-744 Wells Hall, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1027; e-mail: pulidod@msu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the nature of the involvement load (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001) in second language (L2) lexical input processing through reading by considering the effects of the reader-based factors of L2 reading proficiency and background knowledge. The lexical input processing aspects investigated were lexical inferencing (search), attentional allocation during target word (TW) verification (evaluation), TW episodic memory after verification, TW retention, and changes in lexical input processing. This study also addresses the relationships between inferencing and retention as well as the relationships among the various phases of lexical input processing. A questionnaire on self-reported strategy use during the TW verification task was designed to examine motivation and cognitive involvement. A repeated-measures design was used with a cross-sectional sample of 35 adult L2 learners of Spanish. Participants read narratives (one more and one less familiar) that contained nonsense words. They guessed the meanings of the TWs. After reading all of the stories, participants completed an online inference verification task whose goal was to confirm or to correct guesses and to encourage deeper processing of TWs. This was followed by a test of TW episodic memory (yes/no verification) and a strategy questionnaire. Afterward, participants completed two tests that measured receptive retention of meaning. Analyses reveal differential effects of the reader-based variables across the different aspects of lexical input processing and negative changes in lexical input processing due to an interaction between reading proficiency and background knowledge. Results illustrate how reader-based factors also affect learner involvement and lexical input processing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 31 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, S . (1982). Scripts and the recognition of unfamiliar vocabulary: Enhancing second language reading skills. Modern Language Journal, 66, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Alderson, J., & Urquhart, A. (1985). The effect of students’ academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing, 2, 192–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A . (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J . (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J . (2004). Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20, 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. (1998). Evidence for mental models: How do prior knowledge, syntactic complexity, and reading topic affect inference generation in a recall task for nonnative readers of Spanish? Modern Language Journal, 82, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengeleil, N., & Paribakht, S. (2004). L2 reading proficiency and lexical inferencing by university EFL learners. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, E. B . (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical,and classroom perspectives. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Carrell, P . (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., & Donin, J. (1997). Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: Effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 81, 209–227.Google Scholar
Chern, C . (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In Huckin, T., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 67–82). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clark, E . (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, J . (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 225–237). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Paribakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1997). Toward a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C . (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In Ellis, N. C. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211–282). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C . (2001). Memory for language. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C . (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C . (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M . (1999). Incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Graesser, A., & Nakamura, G. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 16, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haastrup, K . (1989). The learner as word processor. AILA Review, 6, 34–46.Google Scholar
Haynes, M . (1993). Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In Huckin, T., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46–62). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Haynes, M., & Baker, I. (1993). American and Chinese readers learning from lexical familiarizations in English text. In Huckin, T., Haynes, M., & Coady, J. (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 130–150). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hudson, T . (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H . (1989). Implicit and incidental second language learning: Experiments in the processing of natural and partly artificial input. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Interlingual processing (pp. 49–73). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H . (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In Arnaud, P. J. & Béjoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H . (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H . (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsen, B., & Gardner, F. (1990). Adult basic learning examination. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W . (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, S . (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K . (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B . (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F . (1986). The effects of three components of background knowledge on second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F., & Wolf, D. (1997). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the word-meaning inferencing strategies of L1 and L2 readers. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 24–64.Google Scholar
Li, X . (1988). Effects of contextual cues on inferring and remembering meanings of new words. Applied Linguistics, 9, 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B . (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Mondria, J . (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: An experimental comparison of the “meaning-inferred method” and the “meaning-given method.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 473–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondria, J., & Wit-de Boer, M. (1991). The effects of contextual richness on the guessability and retention of words in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 12, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H . (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H . (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P . (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paribakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1993). The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 2, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, K . (1997). Vocabulary and comprehension: Two portraits. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 55–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pulido, D . (2000). The impact of topic familiarity, L2 reading proficiency, and L2 passage sight vocabulary on incidental vocabulary gain through reading for adult learners of Spanish as a foreign language . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Pulido, D . (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53, 233–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulido, D . (2004a). The effect of cultural familiarity on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. The Reading Matrix: An Online International Journal, 4, 20–53.Google Scholar
Pulido, D . (2004b). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54, 469–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulido, D . (2007). The effects of topic familiarity and passage sight vocabulary on L2 lexical inferencing and retention through reading. Applied Linguistics, 28, 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulido, D., Hambrick, D. Z., & Russell, M. (2007, April). Individual differences in L2 (Spanish) lexical input processing in incidental and intentional learning conditions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Costa Mesa, CA.Google Scholar
Robinson, P . (2003). Attention and memory. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rott, S . (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form-meaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 95–124.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D . (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R., Bruce, B., & Brewer, W. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R . (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K . (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R . (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In McKeown, M. & Curtis, M. (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y . (1997). Input, intake and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar