Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:15:34.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slow-zone model for longitudinal dispersion in two-dimensional shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

S. C. Chikwendu  and
G. U. Ojiakor
S. C. Chikwendu
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
G. U. Ojiakor
Affiliation:
Civil Engineering Department, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A two-zone model is proposed for the longitudinal dispersion of contaminants in two-dimensional turbulent flow in open channels – a fast zone in the upper region of the flow, and a slow zone nearer to the bottom. The usual one-dimensional dispersion approach (Elder 1959) is used in each zone, but with different flow speeds U1 and U2 and dispersion coefficients D1 and D2 in the fast and slow zones respectively. However, turbulent vertical mixing is allowed at the interface between the two zones, with a small vertical diffusivity ε. This leads to a pair of coupled, linear, one-dimensional dispersion equations, which are solved by Fourier transformation. The Fourier-inversion integrals are analysed using two different methods.

In the first method asymptotically valid expressions are found using the saddle-point method. The resulting cross-sectional average concentration consists of a leading Gaussian distribution followed by a trailing Gaussian distribution. The trailing Gaussian cloud disperses (longitudinally) faster than the leading one, and this gives the long tail observed in most dispersion experiments. Significantly the peak value of the average concentration is found to decay exponentially with time at a rate which is close to the rate observed by Sullivan (1971) in the early stage of the dispersion process. The solution is useful for fairly small times, and both the calculated value of D1 and the predicted bulk concentration distribution are in meaningful agreement with the experimental and simulation data of Sullivan (1971).

In the second method an exact solution is found in the form of a convolution integral for the case D1 = D2 = D0. Explicit expressions which are valid for small times and for large times from the release of contaminant are found. For small times this exact solution confirms the basic results obtained by the saddle-point method. For large times the exact solution gives a contaminant concentration which approaches a Gaussian distribution travelling with the bulk speed as predicted by the Taylor model. The overall longitudinal dispersion coefficient at large times, D(∞), consists of the diffusivity D0 plus a contribution D[ell ](∞) which depends entirely on the vertical mixing. D(∞) is in good agreement with Chatwin's (1971) interpretation of Fischer's (1966) experimental data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 152 , March 1985 , pp. 15 - 38
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1968 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Aris, R. 1956 On the dispersion of solute in fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 235, 67–77.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. A. & Foster, R. M. 1948 Fourier Integrals for Practical Applications. Van Nostrand.
Carrier, C. F., Krook, M. & Pearson, C. E. 1966 Functions of a Complex Variable. McGraw-Hill.
Chatwin, P. C. 1971 On the interpretation of some longitudinal dispersion experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 689–702.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. 1973 A calculation illustrating the effects of the viscous sub-layer on longitudinal dispersion. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 26, 427–439.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1982 The effect of aspect ratio on longitudinal diffusivity in rectangular channels. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 347–358.Google Scholar
Copson, E. T. 1965 Asymptotic Expansions. Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, R. & Sullivan, P. J. 1977 The asymptotic stage of longitudinal turbulent dispersion within a tube. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 293–303.Google Scholar
Elder, J. W. 1959 The dispersion of marked fluid in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 544–560.Google Scholar
Fischer, H. B. 1966 Longitudinal dispersion in laboratory and natural streams. Ph. D. thesis published in Rep. KH-R-12, Keck Lab., Pasadena, California.
Fischer, H. B. 1973 Longitudinal dispersion and turbulent mixing in open channel flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 5, 59–78.Google Scholar
Hays, J. R. 1966 Mass transport mechanisms in open channel flow. Ph.D. thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jobson, H. E. & Sayre, W. W. 1970 J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 96, 703–24.
Smith, R. 1979 Calculation of shear-dispersion coefficients. In Mathematical Modelling of Turbulent Diffusion in the Environment (ed. C. J. Harris), pp. 343–362.
Smith, R. 1981 A delay-diffusion description for contaminant dispersion. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 469–486.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1982 Non-uniform discharges of contaminants in shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 71–89.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. J. 1971 Longitudinal dispersion within a two-dimensional turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 551–576.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 196–203.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1954 The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 223, 446–468.Google Scholar
Thacker, W. C. 1976 A soluble model of 'shear dispersion’. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 6, 66–75.Google Scholar