Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T06:19:24.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the utility of ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for postconcussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2006

SHAUNA KASHLUBA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
JOSEPH E. CASEY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
CHRIS PANIAK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology Services, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

The present study investigated the utility of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th edition (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria for postconcussion syndrome (PCS) symptoms by comparing symptom endorsement rates in a group of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) to those of a noninjured control group at one month and three months post-injury. The 110 MTBI patients and 118 control participants were group-matched on age, gender, and education level. Seven of the nine self-reported ICD-10 PCS symptoms differentiated the groups at one month post-injury and two symptoms differentiated the groups at three months post-injury: symptom endorsement rates were higher in the MTBI group at both time periods. Fatiguing quickly and dizziness/vertigo best differentiated the groups at both time periods, while depression and anxiety/tension failed to differentiate the groups at either time period. Collectively, the ICD-10 PCS symptoms accurately classified the MTBI patients at one month post-injury, with the optimal positive test threshold of endorsement of five symptoms coinciding with a sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 61%, respectively. The ICD-10 PCS symptoms were unable to accurately classify the MTBI patients at three months post-injury. (JINS, 2006, 12, 111–118.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M.P. (1995). Mild traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology, 45, 12531260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, W., Macciocchi, S.N., & Barth, J.T. (1993). Postconcussive symptoms after uncomplicated mild head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 4859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRef
Binder, L.M., Rohling, M.L., & Larrabee, G.J. (1997). A review of mild head trauma: Part I. Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 421431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, L.J., Cassidy, J.D., Peloso, P.M., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., Paniak, C., & Pepin, M. (2004). Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, S84S105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D.D., Lees-Haley, P.R., Earnest, K., & Dolexal-Wood, S. (1995). Post-concussive symptoms: Base rates and etiology in psychiatric patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasquoine, P.G. (1997). Postconcussion symptoms. Neuropsychology Review, 7(2), 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouvier, W.D., Cubic, B., Jones, G., Brantley, P., & Cutlip, Q. (1992). Postconcussion symptoms and daily stress in normal and head-injured college populations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 193211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouvier, W.D., Uddo-Crane, M., & Brown, L.M. (1988). Base rates of postconcussional symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 273278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G.L. & Lange, R.T. (2003). Examination of “postconcussion-like” symptoms in a healthy sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 10, 137144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G.L. & McCracken, L.M. (1997). “Postconcussive” symptoms in persons with chronic pain. Brain Injury, 11, 783790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagoda, A. & Riggio, S. (2000). Mild traumatic brain injury and the postconcussive syndrome. Psychiatric Emergencies, 18, 355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashluba, S., Paniak, C., Blake, T., Reynolds, S., Toller-Lobe, G., & Nagy, J. (2004). A longitudinal, controlled study of patient complaints following treated mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 805816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, T., Cavallo, M.M., Ezrachi, O., & Vavagiakis, P. (1995). The head injury family interview: A clinical and research tool. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J.F. & Nourjah, P. (1988). The epidemiology of mild uncomplicated brain injury. The Journal of Trauma, 28, 16371643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees-Haley, P.R. & Brown, R.S. (1993). Neuropsychological complaint base rates of 170 personal injury claimants. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 203209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClean, A., Dikmen, S.S., & Temkin, N.R. (1993). Psychosocial recovery after head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 10411046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 8687.Google Scholar
Paniak, C., Reynolds, S., Phillips, K., Toller-Lobe, G., Melnyk, A., & Nagy, J. (2002). Patient complaints within 1 month of mild traumatic brain injury: A controlled study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 319334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paniak, C., Toller-Lobe, G., Melnyk, A., & Nagy, J. (2000). A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury: 1 year follow-up. Brain Injury, 14, 219226.Google Scholar
Paniak, C., Toller-Lobe, G., Nagy, J., & Durand, A. (1998). A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 10111023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Kelly, A., Nelms, R., Curran, C., & Ng, K. (2000). Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 568579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slick, D.J., Sherman, E.M.S., & Iverson, G.L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, S. (2005). Retrieved March 1, 2005, from Children's Mercy Hospitals & Clinics Web site: http://www.cmh.edu/stats/diagnostic.asp
Swets, J.A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van Zomeren, A.H. & van den Burg, W. (1985). Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. Journal of neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 48, 2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J.L., Regennitter, R.P., & Barrios, F. (1994). Base rate and simulated symptoms of mild head injury among normals. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 411425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1992). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.