Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T10:08:51.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-Drawing the Line on District Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2006

Michael P. McDonald
Michael P. McDonald
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am grateful for the opportunity to respond to Abramowitz, Alexander, and Gunning's (2006b) rejoinder to my critique of their article appearing in this same issue entitled “Don't Blame Redistricting for Uncompetitive Elections” (2006a). We should have had a scholarly debate that informed the profession and raised interesting questions in one of the widest read journals. Instead, Abramowitz, Alexander, and Gunning mischaracterize my arguments as if this was a political talk show debate, and it is telling that they never directly quote me in their rejoinder. The few sources cited in support of their methodology, upon close inspection, provide no support to their measurement choice or findings. I hope that fair-minded readers will carefully evaluate all material, including cited sources, to reach their own judgment. I conclude this article with some thoughts that I hope shed light on the low levels of electoral competition that Abramowitz, Alexander, and Gunning and I agree characterize current congressional elections.

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 99 - 101
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., Brad Alexander, and Matthew Gunning. 2006a. “Don't Blame Redistricting for Uncompetitive Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January): 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., Brad Alexander, and Matthew Gunning. 2006b. “Drawing the Line on District Competition: A Rejoinder.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January): 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. “Economics, Issues, and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 714–744.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr., and Charles Stewart III 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 17–34.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunell, Thomas. 2006. “Rethinking Redistricting: How Drawing Uncompetitive Districts Eliminates Gerrymanders, Enhances Representation, and Improves Attitudes toward Congress.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January): 77–85.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W., and John R. Petrocik. 2003. “The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994a. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.” American Journal of Political Science 38(2): 514–554.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994b. “Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, Bernard Grofman, and Marc Robbins. 1987. “Partisan and Incumbency Effects of 1970s Congressional Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 680–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopoian, J. David, and Darrell M. West. 1984. “Trading Security for Seats: Strategic Considerations in the Redistricting Process.” Journal of Politics 46(4): 1080–1096.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Gary Jacobson. 2003. Vieth v. Jubelirer, Brief as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party, No. 02-1580.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul, and J. Matthew Wilson. 1999. “Competing Redistricting Plans as Evidence of Political Motives.” American Politics Quarterly 27(2): 147–76.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., Bruce A. Larson, and Suzanne Globetti. 2003. “The Redistricting Cycle and Strategic Candidate Decisions in U.S. House Races.” Journal of Politics 65(4): 1221–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Johnson, Douglas, Elise Lampe, Justin Levitt, and Andrew Lee. 2005. “Restoring the Competitive Edge.” The Rose Institute of State and Local Government, Claremont McKenna College.Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Barry C. Burden. 1999. “The Vote-Stealing and Turnout Effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 233–255.Google Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy, and Walter J. Stone. 1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 79–96.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2006. “Drawing the Line on District Competition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January): 91–94.Google Scholar
Swain, John W., Stephen A. Borrelli, and Brian C. Reed. 1998. “Partisan Consequences of the Post-1990 Redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 945–67.Google Scholar