Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T03:00:09.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption of sound by homogeneous turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

D. T. Noir  and
A. R. George
D. T. Noir
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 Present address: Battelle, Centre de Recherche de Genève, 1227 Genève, Switzerland.
A. R. George
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following problem is treated: given a plane acoustic wave propagating through an unbounded field of turbulence, calculate the amount of acoustic energy converted into turbulent kinetic energy. The fluid velocities due to the acoustic waves and the turbulence are assumed to be small compared with the speed of sound. Thus the sound-turbulence interaction is weak and the turbulent field may be considered to be incompressible. The analysis is based on the interaction of two opposite effects: the acoustic distortion of the turbulence (producing anisotropic Reynolds stresses) and the redistribution of the kinetic energy among components (tendency towards isotropy) and among wavenumbers (energy cascade and dissipation). These phenomena are described using semi-empirical turbulence arguments. It is seen that the simplest model for the redistribution among components is not sufficient for unsteady flows. A more complete model is used which is modified to agree with the exact instantaneous distortion analysis of Ribner [map ] Tucker to first order. Owing to the two redistribution effects, the Reynolds stress behaves inelastically and is out of phase with the acoustic field. Thus there is an average production of turbulent energy corresponding to the absorption of acoustic energy and attenuation of the incident wave. For nearly isotropic turbulence, the attenuation coefficient is found to be proportional to the rate of viscous dissipation and independent of the frequency.

In order to compare the theory with experiment several constants involved in the semi-empirical model of the turbulence must be found. Owing to the lack of better information these constants are estimated here by order-of-magnitude considerations. No existing experiments correspond to the homogeneous turbulence assumed by the theory. Comparison with the few reasonably applicable experiments shows qualitative agreement though the importance of the turbulent absorption is generally of nearly the same order as the measurement error. Several discrepancies between jet noise experiments and aerodynamic noise predictions may be roughly explained using the above analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , 14 June 1978 , pp. 593 - 608
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Betchov, R. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 497.
Betchov, R. 1975 Phys. Fluids 18, 1230.
Clark, R. A., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. S. 1977 Evaluation of subgrid scale turbulence models using a fully simulated turbulent flow. Stanford Preprint.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 453.
Frisch, U., Sulem, P. L. & Nelkin, M. 1978 A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 87 (to appear).Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. & Kraichnan, R. H. 1972 In Statistical Models and Turbulence (ed. M. Rosenblatt & C. Van Atta), p. 148. Springer.
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1976a J. Fluid Mech. 75, 657.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1976b J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1521.
Kuo, A. Y.-S. & Corrsin, S. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 50, 285.
Lilly, D. K. 1972 Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 3, 289; 4, 1.
Mandelbrot, B. 1976 Proc. Journées Mathématiques sur la Turbulence (ed. R. Teman). Springer.
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 2. M.I.T. Press.
Nelkin, M. & Bell, T. L. 1977 One exponent scaling for very high Reynolds number turbulence. Cornell Preprint.Google Scholar
Oboukhov, A. M. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 13, 77.
Orszag, S. A. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 49, 75.
Orszag, S. A. & Patterson, G. S. 1972a Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 76.
Orszag, S. A. & Patterson, G. S. 1972b In Statistical Models and Turbulence (ed. M. Rosenblatt & C. Van Atta), p. 127. Springer.
Patterson, G. S. & Orszag, A. S. 1971 Phys. Fluids 14, 2538.
Pouquet, A. & Patterson, G. S. 1978 J. Fluid Mech. 85, 305.
Riley, J. J. & Patterson, G. S. 1974 Phys. Fluids 17, 292.
Schumann, U. 1975 J. Comp. Phys. 18, 376.
Schumann, U. & Patterson, G. S. 1978a Numerical study of pressure and velocity fluctuations in nearly isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Schumann, U. & Patterson, G. S. 1978b Numerical study of the return of axisymmetric turbulence to isotropy. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Siggia, E. D. 1977 Phys. Rev. A 15, 1730.
Siggia, E. D. 1978 A model to intermittency in three-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Rev. A (to appear).Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W. & Chen, W. Y. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 44, 145.
Van Atta, C. W. & Park, J. 1972 Statistical Models and Turbulence, (ed. M. Rosenblatt & C. Van Atta), p. 402. Springer.