Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:46:25.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lengths of generalized fractions of modules having small polynomial type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2000

NGUYEN TU CUONG
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, P.O. Box 631, BoHo, 10.000 Hanoi, Vietnam; e-mail: cuongnt@hn.vnn.vn
NGUYEN DUC MINH
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, P.O. Box 631, BoHo, 10.000 Hanoi, Vietnam; e-mail: cuongnt@hn.vnn.vn

Abstract

Throughout this paper, let M be a finitely generated module over a Noether local ring (A, [mfr ]) with dim M = d. Let x = (x1, …, xd) be a system of parameters of M and n = (n1, …, nd) ∈ ℕd a d-tuple of positive integers. This paper is concerned with the following two points of view.

First, it is well-known that, the difference between lengths and multiplicities

formula here

considered as a function in n, gives a lot of information on the structure of M. This function in general is not a polynomial in n for all n1, …, nd large enough (n [Gt ] 0 for short). But, it was shown in [C3] that the least degree of all polynomials in n bounding above IM (n, x) is independent of the choice of x. This numerical invariant is denoted by p(M) and called the polynomial type of the module M. By [C2] and [C3] this polynomial type does not change by the [mfr ]-adic completion Mˆ of M and p(M) is just equal to the dimension of the non-Cohen–Macaulay locus of Mˆ (see [C2, C3, C4, CM] for more details). Therefore a module M is Cohen–Macaulay or generalized Cohen–Macaulay if and only if p(M) = − ∞ or p(M) [les ] 0, respectively, where we set by − ∞ the degree of the zero-polynomial. However, one knows little about the structure of M when p(M) > 0.

Second, following Sharp and Hamieh ([SH]), we consider the difference

formula here

as a function in n, where

formula here

is the cyclic submodule of the module of generalized fractions U(M)d−1d+1M defined in [SZ1].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Cambridge Philosophical Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)