Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:59:33.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of short regions of high surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

A. J. Smits ,
S. T. B. Young  and
P. Bradshaw
A. J. Smits
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London Present address: Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Melbourne.
S. T. B. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London Present address: Nuclear Engineering Department, Queen Mary College, London.
P. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurements, including one-point double, triple or quadruple mean products of velocity fluctuations, have been made in low-speed turbulent, boundary layers on flat surfaces downstream of concave or convex bends with turning angles of 20 or 30 degrees, the length of the curved region being at most 6 times the boundary-layer thickness at entry. These short bends approximate to ‘impulses’ of curvature, and the object of the work was to investigate the impulse response of the boundary layer, essentially the decay of structural changes downstream of the bends. The work can be regarded as a sequel, with much more detailed measurements, to the study by So & Mellor (1972, 1973, 1975) who investigated the response to step increases of curvature: turbulent boundary layers being nonlinear systems, responses to several kinds of curvature history are needed to assemble an adequate description of the flow. The most striking feature of the ‘impulse’ response is that the decay of the high turbulent intensity found at exit from the concave bends is not monotonic; the Reynolds stresses in the outer layer collapse to well below the level at entry, and are still falling slowly at the end of the test rig although in principle they must recover eventually. On the convex (stabilized) side the flow recovers, monotonically in the main, from a low level of turbulent intensity at the exit. The pronounced second-order response on the concave side can be explained qualitatively by interaction between the shear stress and the mean shear and is not peculiar to curved flows, but in the present cases the response is complicated by large changes in the dimensionless structure parameters related to double or triple mean products of velocity fluctuations. Strong spanwise variations, due presumably to longitudinal vortices, further complicate the flow in the concave bends, and decay only very slowly downstream.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , 25 September 1979 , pp. 209 - 242
Copyright
© 1979 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradshaw, P. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 22, 679.
Bradshaw, P. 1972 Two more wind tunnels driven by aerofoil type centrifugal blowers. I. C. Aero Rep. 72–10.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1973 Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow. AGAR Dograph 169.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 63, 449.
Bradshaw, P. 1975 J. Fluids Engng, Trans. A.S.M.E. I 97, 146.
Bradshaw, P. 1976 Complex turbulent flows. In Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ed. W. T. Koiter), p. 103. North Holland.
Bradshaw, P. & Wong, F. Y. F. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 52, 113.
Brown, G. L. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1977 Phys. Fluids 20, S243.
Castro, I. P. & Bradshaw, P. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 73, 265.
Chandrsuda, C. 1976 Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London.
Coles, D. E. & Hirst, E. A. 1969 Proc. Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, 1968 AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference, vol. II, Thermosciences Div. Stanford University.
Ellis, L. B. & Joubert, P. N. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 62, 65.
Fernholz, H. H. 1962 Aero. Res. Counc. R. & M. 3368.
Grant, H. L. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 4, 149.
Guitton, D. E. & Newman, B. G. 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 81, 155.
Hoffmann, P. H. & Bradshaw, P. 1978 The response of turbulent boundary layers to mild longitudinal curvature. Imperial College Aero Rep. 78–04.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. P., Halleen, R. M. & Lezius, D. K. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 56, 533.
Koyama, H., Masuda, S., Ariga, I. & Watanabe, I. 1979 Stabilizing and destabilizing effects of Coriolis force on two-dimensional laminar and turbulent boundary layers. J. Engng Power, Trans. A.S.M.E. 101, 23.Google Scholar
Lezius, D. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 77, 153.
Meroney, R. N. & Bradshaw, P. 1975 A.I.A.A. J. 13, 1448.
Patel, V. C. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 23, 185.
Ramaprian, B. R. & Shivaprasad, B. G. 1978 J. Fluid Mech. 85, 273.
Smits, A. J., Eaton, J. A. & Bradshaw, P. 1978 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to lateral divergence. Imperial College Aero Rep. 78–03.Google Scholar
Smits, A. J., Eaton, J. A. & Bradshaw, P. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 94, 243.
Smits, A. J., Young, S. T. B. & Bradshaw, P. 1978 The effect of short regions of high surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers. Imperial College Aero Rep. 78–02.Google Scholar
So, R. M. S. 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 70, 37.
So, R. M. C. & Mellor, G. L. 1972 An experimental investigation of turbulent boundary layers along curved surfaces. N.A.S.A. CR-1940.Google Scholar
So, R. M. C. & Mellor, G. L. 1975 Aero. Quart. 16, 25.
Tobak, M. 1971 Z. angew. Math. Phys. 22, 130.
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.