The Classical Quarterly (New Series)

Shorter Notes

The End of Euripides' Andromache*

Alan H. Sommersteina1

a1 Department of Classical and Archaeological Studies, University of Nottingham

Abstract

Diggle has followed Stevens in rejecting 1279–82. Stevens' objections to these lines were that they ‘should [sc. directly] follow a striking demonstration that birth is more important than wealth in marrying and giving in marriage', and that the lines do not form an apt comment on the fates of Peleus and Neoptolemos. The cogency of these objections will be examined presently; but first a counter-objection will be presented against the hypothesis of interpolation.

Footnotes

* I am indebted to an anonymous CQ referee for some invaluable criticisms and suggestions.