Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:57:18.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diana Boxer, Applying sociolinguistics: Domains and face-to-face interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2006

Kristine L. Fitch
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1498, kristine-fitch@uiowa.edu

Extract

Diana Boxer, Applying sociolinguistics: Domains and face-to-face interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. 244 pp. Hb $108.00, Pb $47.95.

This book has many fine qualities, including careful attention to what is meant by applying linguistics as opposed to applied linguistics. The author's goal is to show readers how research findings in micro-sociolinguistic interaction can be applied to several domains of public and private life: family, education, religion, the workplace, cross-cultural encounters, and so on. Application, in this case, involves awareness of subtleties that go unnoticed in face-to-face interaction, particularly those that create or sustain a power imbalance between participants. That awareness, in turn, sets the stage for “transform(ing) the social order” (p. 22, italics omitted) by empowering “individual speakers in their ordinary day-to-day interactions in all spheres of life and in all stages of life” (222). Instead of a social or political agenda, the book suggests in each domain what would constitute more “humane” interaction: stories would be addressed to children, as well as told about them; collaborative ways of speaking associated primarily with women would be given more status in the workplace and used more often by both women and men; gatekeepers who deal with international students (and other U.S. Americans who interact with speakers for whom English is a second language) would be more sensitive to the potential for face threat to arise from misunderstanding.

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashcraft, K. (1999). Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary executive succession. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:4080.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Cheney, G. (1999). Values at work: Employee participation meets market pressure at Mondragón. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Hopper, R., & Drummond, K. (1990). Emergent goals at a relational turning point: The case of Gordon and Denise. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9:3965.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant, eds., Anthropology and human behavior. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.
Lindsley, S. L. (1999). A layered model of problematic intercultural communication in US-owned maquiladoras in Mexico. Communication Monographs 66:14567.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly 35:14470.Google Scholar
Schely-Newman, E. (1999). Mothers know best: Constructing meaning in a narrative event. Quarterly Journal of Speech 85:285302.Google Scholar