Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:31:19.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rick Iedema, Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2006

Christina Wasson
Christina Wasson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, cwasson@unt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rick Iedema, Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003. Pp. ix, 234. Hb $82.00.

Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization represents an ambitious effort by Rick Iedema to synthesize the fields of discourse studies and organization studies. Not since Deirdre Boden's The business of talk (1994) has this feat been attempted in such depth by a scholar whose starting point is linguistics (as opposed to management theory). Of course, each of the two fields being synthesized includes a large number of diverse perspectives. Iedema develops his theoretical paradigm primarily by highlighting and intertwining the strands of social semiotics and conceptualizations of the “post-bureaucratic organization.” He weaves these together with the aid of Foucauldian notions of discourse and governmentality. In this review, I will first summarize Iedema's argument and then offer an assessment of its strengths and limitations. My description of the book will go into some detail as a service to potential readers, because, in fact, this volume is not easy to read.

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 135 - 140
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, James R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38:408–37.Google Scholar
Barker, James R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boden, Deirdre (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1984). The constitution of society outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grey, Christopher, & Garsten, Christina (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies 22:229–50.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1987). The theory of communicative action 2: Lifeworld and system – a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon.
Heckscher, Charles, & Donnellon, Anne (1994). The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tompkins, Phillip K., & Cheney, George (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In R. D. McPhee andP. K. Tompkins (eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.