Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:35:12.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Perspectives on Voluntarism in Learning Disability Services in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

ANDREW POWER
ANDREW POWER*
Affiliation:
Researcher, Centre for Disability Law and Policy, NUI Galway, Ireland email: andrew.power@nuigalway.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Voluntarism has moved to the centre of most western neo-liberal governments' focus in terms of welfare delivery. At the same time, very little of the social policy literature has identified specific historical, cultural and political contexts of place in shaping the particular form of voluntarism and the scale at which it takes place in a country. In order to address policy-related issues of the voluntary sector, a geographical perspective focusing on these local contexts can be very useful in unpacking how the sector can exist across regional and local scales. This article explores the rise of voluntarism in adult learning disability services in Ireland. Ireland experienced the ‘community turn’ much earlier than most Western states, in that the state advocated a ‘hands-off’ approach in learning disability services from the outset. It uses data from 40 interviews with local health agencies, voluntary organisations and informal carers. It critically examines the complex geographical factors that have contributed to the particular form of voluntarism that has evolved, thus demonstrating that understanding levels of voluntary activity requires attention to local circumstances.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 299 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anheier, H. K. and Salamon, L. M. (1999), ‘Volunteering in cross-national perspective: initial comparisons’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 62: 4, 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, D. (2006), ‘Faith-based organisations and welfare provision in Northern Ireland and North America: whose agenda?1’, in Milligan, C. and Conradson, D. (eds), Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces of Health, Welfare and Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. and Barnett, R. (2006), ‘New times, new relationships: mental health, primary care and public health’, in Milligan, C. and Conradson, D. (eds), Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces in Health, Welfare and Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bondi, L. (2004), ‘A double-edged sword? The professionalisation of counselling in the United Kingdom’, Health and Place, 10: 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breathnach (1992), ‘The Sad Saga of Local Government Reform in Ireland’, Paper presented at Conference on ‘The State of the Irish Political System’, Cork, May.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (1997), RePlacing Citizenship: AIDS Activism and Radical Democracy, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, J., McGuinness, M. and Ford, R. (2002), ‘Chasing a “loose and baggy monster”: almshouses and the geography of charity’, Area, 34: 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Statistics Office (2004), Disability and Carers, Dublin: Government of Ireland.Google Scholar
Cochrane, A. and Gerwitz, S. (2000), Comparing Welfare States, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Crosscare (2007), ‘Who is Crosscare?’, http://www.crosscare.ie/who_is_crosscare.htm, accessed 10 January 2008.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1960), The Problem of the Mentally Handicapped, White Paper, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Social Community and Family Affairs (DSCFA) (2000), Supporting Voluntary Activity: A Framework for Supporting Voluntary Activity and for Developing the Relationship between the State and the Community and Voluntary Sector, White Paper, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Disability Federation of Ireland (DFI) (2002), An Overview of Irish Health Legislation, Dublin: DFI.Google Scholar
Donnelly-Cox, G. and O'Regan, A. (1998), ‘The Irish voluntary sector: a case-based exploration of organisational growth patterns and organisational dynamics, ISTR Conference’, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland, July.Google Scholar
Donnelly-Cox, G., Donoghue, F. and Hayes, T. (2001), ‘Conceptualizing the third sector in Ireland, north and south’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12: 3, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoghue, F. (1998), ‘The politicisation of disadvantage in the Republic of Ireland: the role played by the third sector’, ISTR Conference, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland, July.Google Scholar
Donoghue, F. (2002), ‘Reflecting the relationships: an exploration of the relationships between the former Eastern Health Board and the voluntary organisations in the Eastern Region’, South-Western Area Health Board, Dublin.Google Scholar
Donoghue, F., Anheier, H. and Salamon, L. (1999), Uncovering the Non-profit Sector in Ireland: Its Economic Value and Significance, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Dowse, L. (2001), ‘Contesting practices, challenging codes: self advocacy, disability politics and the social model’, Disability and Society, 16: 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J-L., Kendall, J., Davey, V. and Knapp, M. (2007), ‘Direct payments in England: factors linked to variations in local provision’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatrell, A. (2002), Geographies of Health: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geoghegan, M. and Powell, F. (2006), ‘Community development, partnership governance and dilemmas of professionalization: profiling and assessing the Case of Ireland’, British Journal of Social Work, 36: 845–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C. (2006), ‘Paying family caregivers: evaluating different models’, in Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P. (eds), Cash and Care, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Government of Ireland (1965), Commission of Inquiry on Mental Handicap, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. and Paarlberg, L. (2001), ‘Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: theory and preliminary findings’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30: 4, 684–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslett, D., Ruddle, H. and Hennessy, G. (1998), The Future Organisation of the Home Help Service in Ireland, Dublin: National Council on Ageing and Older People.Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. and Wilton, R. (2003), ‘Disability activism and the politics of scale’, The Canadian Geographer, 47: 2, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalich, W. F. (2006), ‘Developing voluntary community spaces and ethnicity in Sydney, Australia’, in Milligan, C. and Conradson, D. (eds), Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces of Health, Welfare and Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, M. (2000), ‘Flexible contracting? Economic cultures and implicit contracts in social care’, Journal of Social Policy, 29: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, R. and Townsend, A. (2006), ‘A “new institutional fix”? The “community turn” and the changing role of the voluntary sector’, in Milligan, C. and Conradson, D. (eds), Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces of Health, Welfare and Governance, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, E. (1993), ‘Ireland: Catholic corporatism’, in Cochrane, A. and Clarke, J. (eds), Comparing Welfare States: Britain in International Context, London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Meade, R. (2005), ‘We hate it here, please let us stay! Irish social partnership and the community/voluntary sector's conflicted experiences of recognition’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 3, 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, C. (2001), Geographies of Care: Space, Place and the Voluntary Sector, Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Milligan, C. (2007), ‘Geographies of voluntarism: mapping the terrain’, Geography Compass, 1: 2, 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, C. and Fyfe, N. R. (2004), ‘Putting the voluntary sector in its place: geographical perspectives in voluntary activity and social welfare in Glasgow’, Journal of Social Policy, 33: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAMHI (2003), Directory of Services for People with an Intellectual Disability, Dublin: NAMHI.Google Scholar
NAMHI (2004), ‘Homepage’, http://www.namhi.ie/namfr/namfnl.htm, accessed 23 February, 2004.Google Scholar
O'Leary, D. (2000), Vocationalism and Social Catholicism in Twentieth-Century Ireland, Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (1998), Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005), ‘Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, F. W. and Guerin, D. (1997), Civil Society and Social Policy: Voluntarism in Ireland, Dublin: A. A. Farmar.Google Scholar
Quin, S. and Redmond, B. (1996), ‘Moving from needs to rights: social policy for people with disability in Ireland’, in Quin, S., Kennedy, P., O'Donnell, A. and Gabriel, K. (eds), Contemporary Irish Social Policy, Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
Regulska, J. (1999), ‘NGOs and their vulnerabilities during the time of transition: the case of Poland’, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K. and associates (1998), The Emerging Sector Revisited, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W. and List, R. (2003), Global Civil Society: An Overview, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Centre for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
Sherman, A. L. (2000), The Growing Impact of Charitable Choice: A Catalogue of New Collaborations between Government and Faith-based Organizations in Nine States, Washington DC: Center for Public Justice.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. and Bassi, A. (1998), ‘Unpacking the state: the implications for the third sector of changing relationships between national and local government’, Voluntas, 9: 2, 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. (2007), Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. and Harrow, J. (2005), ‘Comparing thistles and roses: the application of governmental–voluntary sector relations theory to Scotland and England’, Voluntas, 16: 4, 375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, T. (1999), ‘Changing expectations: the impact of child ‘protection’ on Irish social work’, Child and Family Social Work, 4: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolch, J. R. (1989), ‘The Shadow State: transformations in the voluntary sector’, in Wolch, J. R. and Dear, M. (eds), The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life, Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Wolch, J. R. (2006), ‘Forward: beyond the shadow state?’, in Milligan, C. and Conradson, D. (eds), Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces of Health, Welfare and Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M. (2002), ‘Partnership in health and social care: the implications of government guidance in the 1990s in England with particular reference to voluntary organisations’, Policy and Politics, 30: 2, 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar