Continuity and Change



Infant feeding practices and infant mortality in England, 1900–1919


VALERIE FILDES a1 1
a1 Holt View, Lye Hill, Breachwood Green, Hitchin, Herts. SG4 8PP

Abstract

Studies of infant mortality in both historical and modern populations from around the world have shown that the most important single factor affecting the infant mortality rate (IMR) is the way in which babies are fed. When methods of infant feeding are unsatisfactory or dangerous, mortality is high; when improvements are made in feeding practices, mortality falls, often dramatically, in a short period of time. The degree to which changes in infant feeding alone can affect IMRs depends on other factors in the population concerned, primarily the health and nutritional status of the mother; sanitary conditions both within the household and in the surrounding environment; levels of endemic and epidemic diseases; the degree of wealth, education and sophistication of the population; and, if women are employed outside the home, the provision made for infant feeding and care by the child's family and by society.

This article examines infant feeding practices in England during the first two decades of the twentieth century, arguably the most important 20 years in the fall in that nation's IMR between 1870 and 1920. The 1900s and 1910s saw many major changes in the ways in which infants were fed in all sections of society. Instigated by government, local Medical Officers of Health and their staff and voluntary organizations, the effect of the infant welfare movement in England in this period was that infants and their mothers were significantly better fed, cared for and able to resist disease in 1919 than in 1900.



Footnotes

1 Editorial note: Valerie Fildes became ill while this article was under review. The article was originally submitted in 1995, and the author and the editors would like to thank Eilidh Garrett of the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure for her assistance in preparing the article for publication. No attempt has been made to update the notes to include citations of studies published since July 1995.