Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:15:25.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Enduring Influence of the Republic of China on Taiwan Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Ralph N. Clough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Taiwan's society today has been shaped primarily by four streams of influence: the traditional China stream, the Japanese stream, the Republic of China stream, and the cosmopolitan stream. The traditional China stream gave the people of Taiwan their language and their basic culture and customs. After 1895 the Japanese stream flowed into Taiwan for 50 years, causing many significant modifications to its society and cutting the people of Taiwan off from the critical changes that occurred in Chinese mainland society during that period. In 1945 the Republic of China (ROC) took over Taiwan, bringing from the mainland its ideology, its educational system; its constitutional structure, its political and social institutions, and a governing elite, most of whom spoke a different dialect of Chinese from the people of Taiwan. The purpose of this article is to identify the principal elements of this ROC stream of influence. The cosmopolitan stream, representing primarily the influence of the West, flowed into all the other streams, to some extent influencing traditional China before the fall of the Qing dynasty, but much more powerfully influencing the ROC on the mainland and Japan. Since 1945 the cosmopolitan stream, at first largely American, has also poured into Taiwan, gaining momentum and diversity with each passing year.

Type
The Republic of China on Taiwan in Historical Perspective
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 148 , December 1996 , pp. 1054 - 1071
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hung-mao, Tien, The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China(Stanford, CA:Hoover Institution Press,1989)pp.1–2, 66–72.Google Scholar

2 Gary Klintworth, Australia's Taiwan Policy(Canberra:Australian National University, 1993) p.132.Google Scholar

3 Gregor, James A., in his study Ideology and Development: Sun Yat-sen and the Economic History of Taiwan(Berkeley, CA:Center for Chinese Studies,1981)Google Scholartraces the influence of Sun's thinking on Taiwan's economic development under the ROC. He feels that most studies of Taiwan's economic development have underestimated Sun's influence (pp. 2–5). See also Chen Cheng, Land Reform in Taiwan(Taiwan:China Publishing Company, 1961), pp. 10–17. General Chen Cheng, who as governor of Taiwan began the land reform in 1949 with reduction of land rents to 37.5% of annual crop yield, gives credit to Sun's ideas. While at the Whampoa Academy in the early 1920s, Chen had been leader of the Society for the Study of Sunyatsenism.Google Scholar

4 Compare, for example,Chiang Ching-kuo's address to the fourth plenary session of the 11th KMT Central Committee, 1 December 1979 (Chairman Chiang Ching-kuo's Opening Address to the KMT Plenum)(Taipei:Kwang Hwa Publishing Company,1979)Google Scholar and his address to the third plenary session of the 12th Central Co72:622 mmittee, 29 March 1986 (President Chiang Ching-kuo's Selected Addresses and Messages 1986(Taipei:Government Information Office, June 1987) pp.7–21) with Lee Teng-hui's report on the state of the nation to the National Assembly in January 1993 (A Report on the State of the Nation) (Taipei: Government Information Office, March 1993)) and his speech to a KMT conference on 30 December 1994 (Lee's Speech at KMT Year-end Confab, Central News Agency, 9 January 1995).Google Scholar

5 Lai Tse-han, Myers, Ramon H. and Wei Wou, A Tragic Beginning: The Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947(Stanford:Stanford University Press,1991).Google Scholar

6 Tun-jen, Cheng and Stephan Haggard, “Regime transformation in Taiwan,” in Cheng and Haggard,Political Change in Taiwan(Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner,1991) pp.1–27)Google Scholar; Hung-mao Tien, “Transformation of an authoritarian party state,”Google Scholar; in ibid.. pp. 33–53.

7 George, Kerr, Formosa: Licensed Revolution and the Home Rule Movement 1895–1945 (Honolulu:University Press of Hawaii,1974) pp.170–71.Google Scholar

8 John, Copper, Taiwan's 1991 and 1992 Non-supplemental Elections(Lanham,MD: University Press of America,1994) pp.35, 58.Google Scholar

9 Nancy Bernkopf, Tucker, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States, 1945–1992(New York:Twayne Publishers,1994), ch. 3.Google Scholar

10 Barbara Tuchman, Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–1945(New York:Macmillan,1970);Google ScholarClaire Chennault,The Way of a Fighter(New York: G. P. Putnam's,1949).Google Scholar

11 Lyman, P.Slyke, Van(ed.),The China White Paper, August 1949(Stanford:Stanford University Press,1967).Google Scholar

12 Tucker, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States, pp. 62–72.Google Scholar

13 Ralph, N.Clougfr,Island China(Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1978), pp. 17–8, 102–106.Google Scholar

14 Lester Wolff and David Simon(eds.),Legislative History of the Taiwan Relations Act (Jamaica, NY:American Association for Chinese Studies,1982).Google Scholar

15 Winkler, Edwin A.and Susan Greenhalgh(eds.), Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan(Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1988);Google ScholarRobert Wade, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton:Princeton University Press,1990).Google Scholar

16 Alan, M. Wachman, “Competing identities in Taiwan,” in Murray, A. Rubenstein(ed.), The Other Taiwan: 1945 to the Present(Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe,1994) pp.40–41.Google Scholar

17 Joseph Bosco, “The emergence of a Taiwanese popular culture,” in Rubenstein, The Other Taiwan, pp. 392–403.Google Scholar

18 18. Kerr, Formosa, pp. 177, 179.Google Scholar

19 Tucker, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States, p. 84Google Scholar

20 China Times Magazine (U.S. edition), 3–9 December 1995, pp. 40–44Google Scholar

21 Beijing Review, 22–28 January 1996, p. 29; China Post, 18 January 1996.Google Scholar

22 Joseph Bosco, “The emergence of Taiwanese popular culture,” in Rubenstein, The Other Taiwan, pp. 396–97.Google Scholar

23 China Post, 11 December 1995; Far Eastern Economic Review, 28 December 1995 and 4 January 1996, p. 23.

24 Samuel, P.Huntington, “Social and institutional dynamics of one-party systems,” in Huntington and Clement H. Moore(eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems(New York: Basic Books,1970), p.12.Google Scholar See also Robert, E. Ward(ed.),Political Development in Modern Japan(Princeton:Princeton University Press,1968), p.590.Google Scholar

25 Tucker, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the United States, pp. 80–87, 116–120, 186–194.Google Scholar