Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:40:18.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE RIGHT TO THE FRUITS OF ONE'S LABOR: A NOTE ON ADAM SMITH'S JURISPRUDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2005

AMOS WITZTUM
Affiliation:
London Metropolitan University

Abstract

This paper provides further evidence to the argument that Smith' theory of justice did not follow the natural justice school and that subsequently the ethical position on acquiring private property is not independent of the effects which such acquisition may have on the property-less individuals. I will show that the justification for private ownership is based on “reasonable expectations” which owners of assets have with regard to the fruits of the asset. The expectation to subsist through the use of one's natural assets is equally reasonable. This is not to say that Smith believed that society should equally distribute income. But it does mean that the acquisition of private property must not interfere with the rights of individuals to subsist. Consequently, distribution is clearly an important part of Smith's conception of justice.

Type
Essay
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am in debt to P. Bridel, A. Cot, J. Young and the anonymous referees of this Journal for helpful comments.