Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:51:26.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The longitudinal development of clusters in French*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2008

KATHERINE DEMUTH  and
ELIZABETH MCCULLOUGH
KATHERINE DEMUTH*
Affiliation:
Brown University, Providence, USA
ELIZABETH MCCULLOUGH
Affiliation:
Brown University, Providence, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Katherine Demuth, Department of Cognitive & Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, United States. e-mail: Katherine_Demuth@brown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of English and German find that children tend to acquire word-final consonant clusters before word-initial consonant clusters. This order of acquisition is generally attributed to articulatory, frequency and/or morphological factors. This contrasts with recent experimental findings from French, where two-year-olds were better at producing word-initial than word-final clusters (Demuth & Kehoe, 2006). The purpose of the present study was to examine French-speaking children's longitudinal acquisition of clusters to determine if these results replicate developmentally. Analysis of spontaneous speech productions from two French-speaking children between one and three years confirmed the earlier acquisition of initial clusters, even when sonority factors were controlled. The findings suggest that French-speaking children acquire complexity at the beginnings of words before complexity appears word-finally. The role of frequency, morphological, structural and input factors is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 425 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We thank Harriet Jisa and other members of Dynamique du Langage at Lyon 2 for data collection and transcription of the Lyon Corpus. We also thank Matthew Adamo, Jennifer Culbertson, Christelle Dodane and Christophe dos Santos for research assistance, and Jae Yung Song for discussion. Funding for this research was supported in part by NIH Grant #R0IMH60922 to the first author.

References

Barlow, J. A. (2005). Sonority effects in the production of consonant clusters by Spanish-speaking children. In Eddington, D. (ed.) Selected proceedings from the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, 1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1984). Phonological rule usage in mother-child speech. Journal of Phonetics 12, 245–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charette, M. (1991). Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. (eds) Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 283–333. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Content, A., Mousty, P. & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex, une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le français écrit et parlé. L'année psychologique 90, 551–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, M. (2004). Consonant cluster simplification in Québec French. Probus 16, 151–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. (1969). L'/R parisien et autres sons du pharynx. The French Review 43, 5–22.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1985). Les règles et les sons. 2nd edition. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1995). Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French. Lingua 95, 5–26.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Beckman, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25, 13–25. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (in press). The Prosody of Syllables, words and morphemes. In Bavin, E. (ed.) Cambridge handbook on child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language & Speech 49, 137–74.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Johnson, M. (2003). Truncation to subminimal words in early French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48, 211–41.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Kehoe, M. (2006). The acquisition of word-final clusters in French. Journal of Catalan Linguistics 5, 59–81.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 35, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echols, C. & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2, 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. (2003). Markedness, faithfulness, vowel quality and syllable structure in French. Journal of French Language Studies 13, 1–33.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Dordrecht: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, A. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W. (eds) Constraints in phonological acquisition, 73–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goad, H. & Brannen, K. (2003). Phonetic evidence for phonological structure in syllabification. In van de Weijer, J., van Heuven, V. J. & van der Hulst, H. (eds) The phonological spectrum, vol. 2, 3–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goad, H. & Rose, Y. (eds) (2003). Special issue: Segmental-prosodic interaction in phonological development: a comparative investigation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48(1–2), 139–452.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Best, C. T. & Levitt, A. (1999). Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics 27, 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. (1990). ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology 7, 301–330.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M., Hilaire-Debove, G., Demuth, K. & Lleó, C. (2008). The structure of branching onsets and rising diphthongs: evidence from the acquisition of French and Spanish. Language Acquisition 15, 5–57.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. & Demuth, K. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language 32(4), 709–734.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. & Demuth, K. (2006). Accounting for variability in 2-year-olds' production of coda consonants. Language Learning and Development 2, 97–118.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1993). A course in phonetics. 3rd edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O. & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition 8, 237–64.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. & Prinz, M. (1996). Consonant clusters in child phonology and the directionality of syllable structure assignment. Journal of Child Language 23, 31–56.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B. (1969). Phonétique française. Malmo: Hermods.Google Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L. & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'année psychologique 101, 447–62. http://www.lexique.org.Google Scholar
Piggott, G. (1991). Apocope and the licensing of empty-headed syllables. The Linguistic Review 8, 287–318.Google Scholar
Plénat, M. (1987). On the structure of rime in standard French. Linguistics 25, 867–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, A. (1994). The phonology and phonetics of extrasyllabicity in French. In Keating, P. (ed.) Papers in laboratory phonology III: Phonological structure and phonetic form, 136–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2000). Headedness and prosodic licensing in the L1 acquisition of phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Stites, J., Demuth, K. & Kirk, C. (2004). Markedness versus frequency effects in coda acquisition. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds) Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 565–76. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Templin, M. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships (Monograph Series No. 26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, The Institute of Child Welfare.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1992). The representation of French final consonants and related issues. In Amastae, J., Goodall, G., Phinney, M. & Montalbetti, M. (eds) Linguistic studies in Romance languages, 53–78. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. & McCune, L. (1994). When is a word a word? Journal of Child Language 21, 517–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamuner, T., Gerken, L. A. & Hammond, M. (2004). Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production. Journal of Child Language 31, 515–36.Google Scholar