Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T16:01:26.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

McTaggart on Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

David H. Sanford
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘The Static Versus the Dynamic Temporal’, The Philosophy of Time, edited by Gale, Richard M. (New York, 1967), p. 65.Google Scholar

2 Mind, XXXIX, pp. 2642.Google Scholar

3 Mind, XVII, pp. 457474Google Scholar; reprinted in McTaggart, 's Philosophical Studies (London, 1934), pp. 110131.Google Scholar

4 Volume II, edited by Broad, C. D. (Cambridge, 1927), Chapter XXXIII, pp. 931.Google Scholar

5 pp. 20–22. This passage is reprinted in full in Gale, 's useful anthology The Philosophy of Time, pp. 9496.Google Scholar

6 ‘Time, McTaggart, and Pickwickian Language’, Philosophical Quarterly, X (07 1960), p. 253Google Scholar. Mink's explication is followed closely by Gale, Richard M., ‘McTaggart's Analysis of Time’, American Philosophical Quarterly, III (04 1966), pp. 145146.Google Scholar

7 Wisdom, John, ‘Time, Fact and Substance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XXIX (19281929), pp. 8185Google Scholar; Stebbing, L. Susan, ‘Some Ambiguities in Discussions Concerning Time’, Philosophy and History, edited by Klibansky, Raymond and Paton, H. J. (Oxford, 1936), pp. 114115.Google Scholar

8 Gotshalk concentrates his attention on this paragraph, pp. 36–42.