Article contents
McTaggart on Time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1968
References
1 ‘The Static Versus the Dynamic Temporal’, The Philosophy of Time, edited by Gale, Richard M. (New York, 1967), p. 65.Google Scholar
2 Mind, XXXIX, pp. 26–42.Google Scholar
3 Mind, XVII, pp. 457–474Google Scholar; reprinted in McTaggart, 's Philosophical Studies (London, 1934), pp. 110–131.Google Scholar
4 Volume II, edited by Broad, C. D. (Cambridge, 1927), Chapter XXXIII, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
5 pp. 20–22. This passage is reprinted in full in Gale, 's useful anthology The Philosophy of Time, pp. 94–96.Google Scholar
6 ‘Time, McTaggart, and Pickwickian Language’, Philosophical Quarterly, X (07 1960), p. 253Google Scholar. Mink's explication is followed closely by Gale, Richard M., ‘McTaggart's Analysis of Time’, American Philosophical Quarterly, III (04 1966), pp. 145–146.Google Scholar
7 Wisdom, John, ‘Time, Fact and Substance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XXIX (1928–1929), pp. 81–85Google Scholar; Stebbing, L. Susan, ‘Some Ambiguities in Discussions Concerning Time’, Philosophy and History, edited by Klibansky, Raymond and Paton, H. J. (Oxford, 1936), pp. 114–115.Google Scholar
8 Gotshalk concentrates his attention on this paragraph, pp. 36–42.
- 1
- Cited by