Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:43:53.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological Deism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Extract

Those who still interest themselves in problems connected with God, Freedom, and Immortality are not accustomed to look to natural science for any light on these dark places. It is usually admitted that the scientific method operates with basic assumptions which are far from binding on philosophers, and which indeed have no very satisfactory metaphysical authority. In spite of a few protests by philosophers, scientific thinkers have on the whole felt entitled to neglect the philosophical consequences of their theories, and have gone ahead in the investigation of nature by accepting only such hypotheses as explained the maximum number of known facts, irrespective of their possible results on other fields of work. When a strictly scientific theory is invested with philosophical importance, some form of materialism, however well disguised, usually results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 30 note 1 Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 4.112.Google Scholar

page 30 note 2 Schlick, M., Proceedings of the Seventh International Philosophical Congress, 1930.Google Scholar

page 31 note 1 Inge, W. R., Science, Religion and Reality, 1925, p. 357.Google Scholar

page 32 note 1 Jeans, J., The Universe Around Us, p. 331.Google Scholar

page 33 note 1 Santayana, G., Poems, 1922, p. 77.Google Scholar

page 34 note 1 See Boycott, A. E., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1928, 22. 55.Google Scholar

page 34 note 2 one µ is one-thousandth part of one millimetre.

page 35 note 1 Peters, R. A., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1930.Google Scholar

page 35 note 2 Lillie, R. S., “Physical Indeterminism and Vital Action,” Science, 1927, 66.139.Google Scholar

page 35 note 3 Donnan, F. G., Journ. Gen. Physiol., 1926, 8. 685.Google Scholar

page 37 note 1 Jennings, H. S., The Biological Basis of Human Nature, Faber & Faber, 1930.Google Scholar

page 38 note 1 Graaf, R. De, De Mulierum Organis Generationi, Leyden, 1672.Google Scholar

page 38 note 2 Leeuwenhoek, A. Von, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 1677,12. 1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 38 note 3 D'aumont, M., article “Generation” in Diderot's Encyclopœdia, 1757, vol.7.Google Scholar

page 38 note 4 Cooke, J., New Theory of Generation, London, 1762.Google Scholar

page 40 note 1 Henderson, L. J., The Fitness of the Environment, Macmillan, 1913.Google Scholar

page 41 note 1 See Stephenson, M., Bacterial Metabolism, Longmans Green, 1930.Google Scholar