Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:01:45.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to Antony Flew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

James Giles
James Giles
Affiliation:
Aalborg University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 69 , Issue 267 , January 1994 , pp. 97 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philosophy, 67, 261 (July 1992), 394–398. Further references are included in the text.Google Scholar

2 Philosophy, 66, 257 (July 1991), 339–347. Further references are included in the text.Google Scholar

3 For a presentation of the view that there is no such thing as personal identity see my ‘The No-self Theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal Identity’, Philosophy East and West, 43, 2 (April 1993), 175–200.Google Scholar