Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:26:10.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lyme disease in France: a primary care-based prospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2005

L. LETRILLIART
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for Electronic Disease Surveillance, Inserm Unit 707, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
B. RAGON
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for Electronic Disease Surveillance, Inserm Unit 707, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
T. HANSLIK
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, and Paris 5 University, France
A. FLAHAULT
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for Electronic Disease Surveillance, Inserm Unit 707, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To estimate the incidence of Lyme borreliosis in France, describe its clinical presentations, and assess its potential risk factors, we conducted a nationwide prospective study in the French Sentinelles Network, consisting of 1178 general practitioners (GPs). Of these, 875 (74%), i.e. 1·6% of all French GPs, participated in the study from May 1999 to April 2000. Eighty-six cases of Lyme disease were reported and validated, of which 77 (90%) consisted of erythema migrans. At national level, the incidence was estimated at 9·4/100000 inhabitants. Compared to the French general population, Lyme disease patients were older (P<10−4), more were living in rural areas (P<10−3), and amongst the working population, more were farmers (P<10−3) and fewer, salaried workers (P<0·005). Cervidae density correlated strongly with the estimated regional incidence of Lyme disease (r=0·82). Both incidence data and identified risk factors can help to target measures for its prevention and treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press