a1 University of St. Andrews
It seems common at the moment to make agent-neutrality a necessary condition of ‘consequentialism” and to hold that deontological ethics are agent-relative. This note argues that both these tendencies regrettably obscure useful terms and distinctions. It concludes by considering what it would be best, now, to mean by ‘utilitarianism” and making a proposal.
* I am grateful to John Broome, Roger Crisp, and Berys Gaut for comments on earlier versions of this note.