Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:25:56.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frightening the ‘Landed Fogies’: Parliamentary Politics and The Coal Question*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Michael V. White
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In early 1864, disappointed by the response to his previous work, the young Manchester academic W. Stanley Jevons announced that he was undertaking a study of the so-called coal question: ‘A good publication on the subject would draw a good deal of attention … it is necessary for the present at any rate to write on popular subjects’. When Jevons's The Coal Question (henceforth CQ) was published in April 1865, however, it received comparatively little attention and sales were slow. Jevons and his publisher, Alexander Macmillan, then began sending complimentary copies to luminaries such as Sir John Herschel and Alfred Tennyson. In February 1866 the marketing campaign produced its first substantial return. Macmillan had sent CQ to William Gladstone who responded with letters to both Macmillan and Jevons, noting that the book had strengthened his ‘conviction’ on the necessity for reducing the National Debt. In April, John Stuart Mill praised CQ in the House of Commons, calling for action on the Debt and, three weeks later, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gladstone introduced the budget using half his speech to examine the Debt situation and referring to CQ in support for a proposed measure of Debt reduction. With the extensive publicity given to CQ following Mill's speech and the budget, Jevons had achieved his objective in writing the text which went into a second edition in 1866. On the face of it, CQ's success was due to its effect of introducing a change in budget policy and this is the impression given by some accounts of the episode.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , November 1991 , pp. 289 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

While the usual caveat applies on responsibility for the final product, I would like to thank an anonymous referee for comments and C. L. Ten for his advice and encouragement.

References

1 Essays on Economics and Society, ed. Rohson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto and London, 1967Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, iv. 370.Google Scholar

2 Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, ed. Black, R. D. Collison, 7 vols., London, 1972–1981, iii. 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Jevons, W. S., The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of our Coal Mines, London and Cambridge, first edition 1865Google Scholar (henceforth CQ1); second edition 1866 (henceforth CQ2).

4 Jevons, , Papers and Correspondence, i. 203Google Scholar; iii. 84, 87–8. See also Konekamp, R., ‘Biographical Introduction’Google Scholar, in ibid., i. 43–5.

5 Hirst, F. W., ‘Introduction’ in W. S. Jevons, The State in Relation to Labour, London, 1910, p. xivGoogle Scholar; Wicksteed, P. H., The Common Sense of Political Economy and Selected Papers and Reviews on Economic Theory, 2 vols., London, 1934, ii. 809Google Scholar; Kynaston, D., The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lavenham, 1980, pp. 115–16Google Scholar. See also Konekamp, , p. 45Google Scholar; Schabas, M., ‘The “Worldly Philosophy” of William Stanley Jevons’, Victorian Studies, xxviii (1984), 133.Google Scholar

6 For an example of the style of Jevons's attack on Mill's political economy, see his The Theory of Political Economy, ed. Black, R. D. Collison, Harmondsworth, 1970, pp. 71–2Google Scholar; For Mill's philosophy, see Jevons, , Pure Logic and Other Minor Works, ed. Adamson, R. and Jevons, H. A., London, 1890, p. 202Google Scholar. For discussion of Jevons's hostility to Mill; see White, M. V., ‘Jevons's Charge of “The Noxious Influence of Authority”. A Note’, History of Economic Thought Society of Australia, HETSA Bulletin, No. 7, Winter 1987, 20–9, and the references cited therein.Google Scholar

7 Kinzer, Bruce L., ‘Introduction’, John Stuart Mill, Public and Parliamentary Speeches, ed. Robson, John M. and Kinzer, Bruce L., 2 vols., Toronto and London, 1989Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, xxviii. pp. xxvi, xiv.Google Scholar

8 Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 3rd Series, clvi. 957–9, 1267–8.Google Scholar

9 Hull, Edward, The Coal-Fields of Great Britain: Their History, Structure, and Resources, 2nd edn., London 1861, p. viii.Google Scholar

10 Armstrong, W. G., ‘Address’, Report of Thirty-Third Meeting of the British Association of the Advancement of Science, London, 1863.Google Scholar

11 For a more detailed discussion of CQ's analysis, see Eckard, W. E., Economics of W. S. Jevons, Washington, 1940, ch. 4Google Scholar; Black, R. D. Collison, ‘W. S. Jevons, 1835–82’, in Pioneers of Modern Economics, ed. O'Brien, D. P. and Presley, J. R., London, 1980, esp. pp. 12–17Google Scholar; Peart, Sandra, ‘The Population Mechanism in W. S. Jevons's Applied Economies’, The Manchester School, lviii (1990), 37–45.Google Scholar

12 Principles of Political Economy, ed. Robson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto and London, 1965Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ii. 48–9, 52, 55, 72.Google Scholar

13 Principles of Political Economy, CW, iii. 876, 878.Google Scholar

14 CQ2, p. xlixGoogle Scholar; Jevons, W. S., ‘Mr Gladstone's New Financial Policy’, Macmillan's Magazine, xiv (1866), 132–3.Google Scholar

15 Eckard, , p. 62.Google Scholar

16 Principles of Political Economy, CW, ii. 61, 78Google Scholar; iii. 740, 741, 874, 876. In view of the above, it does not appear that Mill was ‘unable to find a favourable word for public debt’, as claimed by Breit, W., ‘Starving The Leviathan: Balanced Budget Prescriptions before Keynes’, Fiscal Responsibility in Constitutional Democracy, ed. Buchanan, J. M. and Wagner, R. E., Leiden and Boston, 1978, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

17 Principles of Political Economy, CW, iii. 741.Google Scholar

18 Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 3rd Series, clxxii. 389, 1522Google Scholar. Mill's speech is reprinted in Public and Parliamentary Speeches, CW, xxviii. 69–73.Google Scholar

19 Buchanan, J. M., Wagner, R. E. and Burton, J., The Consequences of Mr Keynes, Hobart Paper No. 78, London, 1978, p. 32.Google Scholar

20 Parliamentary Debates, clxxii. 1509–19, 1527.Google Scholar

21 The ‘tradition’ was accompanied by proclamations of the ‘moral virtues’ of thrift and probity and the ‘demoralising’ effects of public expenditure (Roseveare, H., The Treasury.The Evolution of a British Institution, London, 1969, p. 87)Google Scholar. This was underpinned initially by Thomas Chalmers's political economy. See Hilton, Boyd, Corn, Cash, Commerce. The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments 1815–1830, Oxford, 1977, pp. 303–13.Google Scholar

22 Konekamp, , p. 44.Google Scholar

23 Shannon, R., Gladstone, London, 1982, p. 288Google Scholar; Hawkins, A. B., ‘A Forgotten Crisis: Gladstone and the Politics of Finance during the 1850s’, Victorian Studies, xxvi (1983), 287–320Google Scholar; Anderson, O., ‘Loans versus Taxes: British Financial Policy in the Crimean War’, The Economic History Review, xvi (1963), 315–16Google Scholar; Zimmeck, M., ‘Gladstone Holds His Own: The Origins of Income Tax Relief for Life Insurance Policies’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, lviii (1985), 167–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar. As Jevons noted in 1866: ‘There is no charge against this great minister more common than that of impulsiveness and inconsistency’ (‘Gladstone's New Financial Policy’, 131).Google Scholar

24 ‘Introduction’, The Gladstone Diaries, ed. Matthew, H. C. G., 9 vols, (to date), Oxford, 1968–v. p. xxxiGoogle Scholar; Matthew, , ‘Disraeli, Gladstone, and the Politics of Mid-Victorian Budgets’, The Historical Journal, xxii (1979), 623–34Google Scholar; Anderson, , 315.Google Scholar

25 Roseveare, , p. 187Google Scholar; Matthew, , ‘Disraeli, Gladstone’Google Scholar; Tomlinson, J., Problems of British Economic Policy 1870–1945, London, 1981, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

26 Zimmeck, , 170Google Scholar; Anderson, O., ‘Wage-earners and Income Tax: a mid-nineteenth century discussion’, Public Administration, xlii (1963), 189–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Morley, J., The Life of William Ewart Gladstone, 2 vols., London, 1903, ii. 52Google Scholar; Clapham, J., The Bank of England. A History, 2 vols., Cambridge, 1944, ii. 252–5, 274Google Scholar; Guiseppi, J., The Bank of England. A History from its Foundation in 1694, London, 1966, pp. 116–17Google Scholar; Matthew, , ‘Introduction’, p. xxxivGoogle Scholar; Shannon, , pp. 289, 319, 245Google Scholar; ‘Mr Gladstone On Consols’, The London Review, 7 03 1863, pp. 239–40.Google Scholar

28 Matthew, , ‘Disraeli, Gladstone’, 616–17, 623–5, 637.Google Scholar

29 Jevons, W. S., The Principles of Economics and Other Essays, ed. Higgs, Henry, London, 1905, pp. xv, 253–64.Google Scholar

30 Zimmeck, , 181.Google Scholar

31 ‘The National Debt’, The Spectator, 13 01 1866, pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

32 Ghosh, P. R., ‘Disraelian Conservatism: A Financial Approach’, The English Historical Review, xc (1984), 280.Google Scholar

33 Parliamentary Debates, clxxii (1866), pp. 1522, 1566–73.Google Scholar

34 Such as the fractious disputes over income differentiation which marked the 1850s and early 1860s. See Zimmeck; Shehab, F., Progressive Taxation. A Study in the Development of the Progressive Principle in the British Income Tax, Oxford, 1953, chs. 6–9.Google Scholar

35 Bentley, M., Politics without Democracy 1815–1914, London, 1984, pp. 183, 185Google Scholar; Smith, F. B., The Making of the Second Reform Bill, Melbourne, 1966, pp. 63, 70Google Scholar; Disraeli, Derby and the Conservative Party. Journal and Memoirs of Edward Henry, Lord Stanley 1849–1869, ed. Vincent, J., Hassocks, 1978, p. 208Google Scholar; The Times, 8 02 1866, p. 7Google Scholar. Mill's first two parliamentary speeches were concerned with the effects of the plague. See Public and Parliamentary Speeches, CW, xxviii. 47–52.Google Scholar

36 Stanley Journal, ed. Vincent, pp. 244–5Google Scholar; Monypenny, W. F. and Buckle, G. E., The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield, 6 vols., London, 1916, vi. 247.Google Scholar

37 Buxton, S., Finance and Politics. An Historical Study 1783–1885, 2 vols., London, 1888, ii. 26–7.Google Scholar

39 Parliamentary Debates, clxxii. 398–403Google Scholar. The annuities were unpopular because the principal of the security was repaid year by year and income tax was levied on both the principal and interest. See Hargreaves, E. L., The National Debt, London, 1930, p. 117.Google Scholar

39 Buxton, , pp. 28–33.Google Scholar

40 Hargreaves, , pp. 180–1.Google Scholar

41 The Times, 19 04 1866, p. 10Google Scholar; 4 May, p. 8. Writing in the next year on the Debt, Robert Giffen was also sceptical about the relevance of the coal question. ‘The Reduction of the National Debt’ (1867) in Essays in Finance, London, 1880, pp. 259–61, 278–9.Google Scholar

42 Parliamentary Debates, clxxii. 408.Google Scholar

43 ‘The Budget’, Illustrated London News, 12 05 1866Google Scholar; Jevons, , Papers and Correspondence, iii. 102.Google Scholar

44 Jevons, , Papers and Correspondence, iii. 120.Google Scholar

45 CQ1, pp. 216–17Google Scholar; CQ2, pp. xxix–xxxGoogle Scholar; Black, , ‘W. S. Jevons’, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

46 Zimmeck.

47 Kinzer, , ‘Introduction’, p. xxv.Google Scholar