CJO - Abstract - A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method

Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
British Journal of Nutrition (2009), 101 : 446-456 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0007114508027438 (About doi)
Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 Jul 2008
Cambridge Journals Online - CUP Full-Text Page
British Journal of Nutrition (2009), 101:446-456 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © The Authors 2008
doi:10.1017/S0007114508027438

Full Papers

Innovative Techniques

A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method


Corby K. Martina1 c1, Hongmei Hana1, Sandra M. Coulona1, H. Raymond Allena1, Catherine M. Champagnea1 and Stephen D. Antona2

a1 Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
a2 Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, PO Box 112610, Gainesville, FL, USA
Article author query
martin ck PubMed  Google Scholar
han h PubMed  Google Scholar
coulon sm PubMed  Google Scholar
allen hr PubMed  Google Scholar
champagne cm PubMed  Google Scholar
anton sd PubMed  Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to report the first reliability and validity tests of the remote food photography method (RFPM), which consists of camera-enabled cell phones with data transfer capability. Participants take and transmit photographs of food selection and plate waste to researchers/clinicians for analysis. Following two pilot studies, adult participants (n 52; BMI 20–35 kg/m2 inclusive) were randomly assigned to the dine-in or take-out group. Energy intake (EI) was measured for 3 d. The dine-in group ate lunch and dinner in the laboratory. The take-out group ate lunch in the laboratory and dinner in free-living conditions (participants received a cooler with pre-weighed food that they returned the following morning). EI was measured with the RFPM and by directly weighing foods. The RFPM was tested in laboratory and free-living conditions. Reliability was tested over 3 d and validity was tested by comparing directly weighed EI to EI estimated with the RFPM using Bland–Altman analysis. The RFPM produced reliable EI estimates over 3 d in laboratory (r 0·62; P < 0·0001) and free-living (r 0·68; P < 0·0001) conditions. Weighed EI correlated highly with EI estimated with the RFPM in laboratory and free-living conditions (r>0·93; P < 0·0001). In two laboratory-based validity tests, the RFPM underestimated EI by − 4·7 % (P = 0·046) and − 5·5 % (P = 0·076). In free-living conditions, the RFPM underestimated EI by − 6·6 % (P = 0·017). Bias did not differ by body weight or age. The RFPM is a promising new method for accurately measuring the EI of free-living individuals. Error associated with the method is small compared with self-report methods.

(Received December 12 2007)

(Revised March 25 2008)

(Accepted April 28 2008)

(Online publication July 11 2008)

Key Words:Digital photography; Food intake; Energy intake; Measurement; Self-report

Correspondence:

c1 Corresponding author: Dr Corby K. Martin, fax +1 225 763 3045, email Corby.Martin@pbrc.edu

Footnotes

Abbreviations: DLW, doubly labelled water; EI, energy intake; EMA, ecological momentary assessment; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; PBRC, Pennington Biomedical Research Center; PDA, personal digital assistant; RFPM, remote food photography method


Cambridge University Press