Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T17:31:33.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytoremediation, Part II: Management Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2005

Robert G. Beauchamp
Affiliation:
Environmental Management Program, Graduate School of Management and Technology, University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, Maryland
E. Kudjo Dzantor
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Get access

Abstract

Environmental regulators and other stakeholders prefer cleanup technologies that are successful, cost effective, and not disruptive to a site. Phytoremediation offers an appealing in situ option to managers of remediation projects. Remediation project managers and teams must be experienced and work closely together. For moderately water soluble organic contaminates, it may be possible to utilize plant species that can translocate and metabolize a contaminant within their shoots. For highly lipophilic compounds, a phytoremediation strategy would best focus on stimulation of biodegradation within the root zone of plants. Metal hyperaccumulator plant species have demonstrated successful growth under high enrichments of specific metals. However, while there is promise for hyperaccumulators concentrating metals, their low biomass suggests total uptake may be low. Genetic manipulations of potential plants may possibly overcome this difficulty, but there are inherent societal concerns and risks. Matrix manipulation may enhance phytoremediation by improving the availability of metals, but care must be taken to not impair plant growth and prevent off-site migration of metals. A thorough site characterization is required to properly design a strategy. Costs associated with phytoremediation are competitive with other remediation technologies and cost recovery can be realized when metals have a high enough value to be recycled following harvesting from the plant biomass.

Type
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Copyright
© 2002 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)