Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:37:46.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Islam and Trade in the Bilād AL-Sūdān, Tenth-Eleventh Century A.D.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Michael Brett
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London

Extract

Two fatwā-s or legal opinions of the jurist al-Qābisī at Qayrawān about the year A.D. 1000 show the way in which the Law of Islam was used to protect the Muslim against the hazards of trans-Saharan trade with the Bilād al-Sūdan. Trade was to be conducted as far as possible in accordance with the Law, and approval was given to the establishment of Muslim communities in the Bilād al-Sūdān under the authority of a nāzir or ‘watchman’, with the consent of the pagan king of the country. The formation of Muslim communities on this legal basis, and their incorporation into the pattern of West African society, were important for the subsequent character of Islam in West Africa. Meanwhile, among the ‘stateless’ Berber peoples of the Western Sahara, the doctrines of the Malikite school were subject to a different interpretation by Ibn Yasln, which came into open conflict with the views of al-Qābisī when the Almoravids sacked the Muslim city of Awdaghast for submitting to the pagan king of Ghana. This conflict of attitudes to paganism remained a feature of West African Islam down to the twentieth century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Roland, Oliver (ed.), Cambridge History of Africa, III (Cambridge, 1977), 284285, 313.Google Scholar

2 Hopkins, J. F. P., trans., Levtzion, N. and Hopkins, J. F. P., ed., Corpus of early Arabic sources for West African history (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar

3 Al-Wansharīshī, , Al-Mi‘yār al-mu'rib wa ’l-jāmi‘ al-mughrib ‘an fatāwī ahl Ifriqiya via ’l-Andaluswa ’l-Maghrib, 12 vols., lithographed (Fes, 1314–15 A.H.).Google Scholar

4 Cf.Page, J. D. (ed.), Cambridge History of Africa, II (Cambridge, 1978), chs. 8, 10Google Scholar; Idris, H. R., La Berberie orientals sous les Zirides, Xe-XIIe siècles (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar

5 Idris, , 'Berberie orientate, 568572Google Scholar; Brunschvig, R., La Berberie orientate sous les Haffides, des origines a la fin du XV siecle, 2 vols. (Paris, 1940, 1947), II, 138141.Google Scholar

6 Idris, H. R., ‘Deuxjuristes kairouanais de l'époquezīrīde: Ibn AbīZayd et al-Qābisī’, Annales de l'lnstitut des Etudes Orientates (Algiers), XII (1954), 122198, p. 181.Google Scholar

7 Cf. Berque, J., L'Intérieur du Maghreb, XVe-XIXe siecle (Paris, 1978), 31, n. 3.Google Scholar

8 Mi'yār, IX, 78–9.

9 The greatest jurist of the Malikite school in IfrTqiya, fl. c. A.D. 850; cf.Cambridge History of Africa, II, 539–40.

10 In the work of al-Qābisī's contemporary Ibn AbT Zayd this opinion becomes: ‘trade with the land of enmity ('adw) and the Bilad al-Sudan is wrong and hateful. The Prophet said: “the journey is a part of the punishment”’: Al-Qayrawānī, Ibn Abt Zayd, La, Risāla, ed, and trans. Bercher, L. (Algiers, 1945), 318319Google Scholar; cf. Cambridge History of Africa, II, 650; III, 284285.Google Scholar

11 Mi'yar, I, 98–9.

12 'Adāwa, ‘enmity’, i.e. opposition to the Law, with reference here to lands unconquered and ungoverned by Muslims and their Law; cf. 'adw, n. 10 above.

13Adā’, ‘transgression’: a third form, after 'adāwa and 'adw, with the same meaning of opposition to the Law, but used here of Muslims, not infidels, who have broken the Law and therefore sinned.

14 Hopkins, and Levtzion, , Corpus, 4352, 6287.Google Scholar

15 See above, n. 10.

18 For this general attitude, cf., e.g. de Santillana, D., ‘Law and Society’, in Sir, Thomas Arnold and Guillaume, A., The Legacy of Islam, Ist ed. (Oxford, 1931), 284310, 301303Google ScholarRosenthal, E. I. J., Political Thought in Medieval Islam (Cambridge, 1958), 5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Cf. Nachtigal, G., Sahara and Sudan, trans. Allan, G. B. and Humphrey, J. Fisher (London, 1974 onwards), II, 237–8.Google Scholar

18 For references see Cambridge History of Africa, II, ch. II also Norris, H. T., The Berbers in Arabic Literature (London and New York, 1982), 105156.Google Scholar

19 The duty of the hisba, incumbent upon all Muslims and especially upon their rulers, to secure the rule of the Law of God.

20 Al-Bakrī, , Description de l'Afrique septentrionale, ed. and French, trans. De Slane, M. G. (Paris, 1965), 169170, trans. 319320Google Scholar; cf. Hopkins, and Levtzion, Corpus, 7475.Google Scholar The ignorance of Ibn YasTn has been vigorously denied: cf. Norris, , Berbers, 122–7Google Scholar; but if he was misrepresented to his contemporaries in the Maghrib, the misrepresentation had the value of truth, and al-Bakrī's report retains its value for a discussion of juristic opinion.

21 Ignorance or excessive severity, which might be the same thing: Al-BakrT, , Description, 165–6, trans. 313Google Scholar; Hopkins, and Levtzion, , Corpus, 7172Google Scholar; cf. Norris, , Berbers, 112113.Google Scholar

22 Al-Bakrī, , Description, 170, trans. 320Google Scholar; Hopkins, and Levtzion, , Corpus, 75.Google Scholar

23 Seen. 21.

24 Al-BakrT, , Description, 168, trans. 317Google Scholar; Hopkins, and Levtzion, , Corpus, 7374.Google Scholar

25 Fisher, Humphrey J., ‘Early Arabic Sources and the Almoravid Conquest of Ghana’, Journal of African History, XXIII (1982), 549560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar